How does this one stack up?

Posts
3,086
Likes
3,579
http://www.ebay.com/itm/201008299911?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649#ht_987wt_896

$_57.JPG
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
6,713
Likes
18,566
Obvious wear issues, but looks original to me.
 
Posts
2,927
Likes
6,237
If you look carefully at the left index near the 12 hour subdial, you'll notice it oversteps a little. At least that what it looks like to me. It's at the very least not even with the right one. Don't you think so?

The other pictures in the Ebay auction make this more clear.
 
Posts
7,758
Likes
26,969
If you look carefully at the left index near the 12 hour subdial, you'll notice it oversteps a little. At least that what it looks like to me. It's at the very least not even with the right one. Don't you think so?

The other pictures in the Ebay auction make this more clear.

I do not know what you are referring to, and very much doubt that the dial is not original.
 
Posts
2,927
Likes
6,237
The applied index near the 12 hour subdial looks to be crossing over the subdial. At least that's what it looks like to me, in some of the other pictures. That's all I'm saying.

The rest looks good.
 
Posts
7,758
Likes
26,969
The applied index near the 12 hour subdial looks to be crossing over the subdial. At least that's what it looks like to me, in some of the other pictures. That's all I'm saying.

The rest looks good.

I remain confused. Near the 12 hour subdial? There are no applied indexes remotely close to the top (i.e. 12:00) subdial. In fact, the only applied index that might be construed (I'd argue misconstrued) as crossing over a subdial is the 7:00 marker. I don't believe that to be the case, though, and would argue that it is a shadow.

For future reference, if you are going to refer to an applied index, why not simply refer to the precise hour?
 
Posts
2,927
Likes
6,237
I don't mean the 12th hour of the 12 hour subdial. I meant simply the 12 hour subdial, as I said. You're right. It's the 7 hour marker. I don't see a difference between the identifications.

In any case, I disagree. Here is a face shot and an enlarged look. I believe that the sides are not symmetrical.



 
Posts
12,761
Likes
17,294
This dial is so sharp, I can't see how it isn't original. At least with repsect to the printing.

It is possible that the marker fell off or became loose and was repaired long ago. It is also possible that the original dial work was slighly off.

We sometimes forget that manufacturers in the 1930's and '40's didn't have some of the modern tools and techniques that exist today. I have seem similar anomolies on Omega chronographs.

Hope this helps,
gatorcpa
 
Posts
7,758
Likes
26,969
This dial is so sharp, I can't see how it isn't original. At least with repsect to the printing.

It is possible that the marker fell off or became loose and was repaired long ago. It is also possible that the original dial work was slighly off.

We sometimes forget that manufacturers in the 1930's and '40's didn't have some of the modern tools and techniques that exist today. I have seem similar anomolies on Omega chronographs.

Hope this helps,
gatorcpa

I agree with this view, and do not believe that the marker issue undercuts the conclusion that the dial is original.