Hodinkee. What a damn shame.

Posts
676
Likes
1,056
You are making a lot of assumptions about what people are disliking them for. I am not jealous of anyone's success, but that doesn't mean I like hodinkee and how they do business.

As for the comparison to auto media, well I've never considered any "watch journalism" to be "actual" journalism, and I don't see "automotive journalism" as being any different. I know people who turned their "journalism" jobs into jobs with car companies...just like mods on TZ from back in the day turned their positions on that forum into jobs with watch companies.

It's all very "don't bite the hand that feeds you" and in the end sometimes that's the hand that hires you if you play your cards right...or in the case of hondikee the brand that partners with you so you can make a lot of money.

I still go back to the "glowing" VC review done by JF calling their chronograph the most significant collector piece in long time or some such nonsense. It's a nice watch and all, but him posting that a few months before the hondinkee LE of the same watch came out (which would have already been in the works with VC) tells me that this was a calculated long game to pump that watch up and help sales of their LE. Nothing illegal certainly, but puts virtually anything they say in question for me, and I will be waiting for the other shoe (or LE partnership) to drop. I actually think they overplayed their hand on that one, because their LE's seem to sell well enough without having to do what they did...

I don't like hodinkee, but I'm not prejudiced in this regard - I share my disdain for them all equally. 😀
Most likely, one of the main reasons they made a limited edition of the VC Cornes de Vache chrono was because they liked it so much.
 
Posts
2,152
Likes
3,810
Actually Ben was quite disparaging about Rolex in this video ("Rolex was total meh...Rolex can't deliver shit")

Stephen and Cara are often out of their depth and very much fan boys/girls of certain brands. Joe, Jack and James all contribute good content.

As with any content platform, read what you like and ignore (or laugh at) what you think is ridiculous. I thought some of their interviews for the Hodinkee 10 celebrations were quite entertaining. I tend to ignore any comment they put out ref. Tudor...the bias force is too strong on that brand😀
Edited:
 
Posts
29,672
Likes
76,830
Most likely, one of the main reasons they made a limited edition of the VC Cornes de Vache chrono was because they liked it so much.

Even if that were true (and I'm not saying it is by any means, because really how would we know what they really like and what they are pumping in the name of future profits?), it doesn't excuse how they went about it.
 
Posts
448
Likes
845
Some thoughts..
Hodinkee kind of pushes boundaries on journalism independence but iI think they still make some nice content, especially when they take a deep dive. Producing content cost serious money. It's a profession and we all eat this content. Without journalists the watch industry would have a hard time. They need each other. If Hodinkee for instance would do a Philip Stahl kind of f*ck the embargo press-release revelation, Rolex most could ban the reporters from Hodinkee for a couple of years.
It's really funny actually when you see some of the journalists making videos at Baselworld while they they look utter bored because it is the watch introduction number 1000 they have to report.
To get back on the OP. I don't know if Hodinkee could change their strategy into a more kind of Top Gear kind of way. Clarkson would tell it if a car was sjite. Although they would never tell that about a Ferrari or a Porsche....It would be kind of refreshing if a watch journalist would do the same kind of thing.
 
Posts
676
Likes
1,056
Even if that were true (and I'm not saying it is by any means, because really how would we know what they really like and what they are pumping in the name of future profits?), it doesn't excuse how they went about it.
Sure we can’t actually know what is in their head, but it would make sense that they would make a LE that they actually enjoyed, which I think this one is. I think some of the later ones like Hermès and IWC seem more like cash grabs than passion projects.
 
Posts
29,672
Likes
76,830
it would make sense that they would make a LE that they actually enjoyed

That is certainly what they wanted people to believe.
 
Posts
29,672
Likes
76,830
That is certainly what they wanted people to believe.

🤨

Sure we can’t actually know what is in their head

Crazy indeed...
 
Posts
1,706
Likes
5,686
Actually Ben was quite disparaging about Rolex in this video ("Rolex was total meh...Rolex can't deliver shit")

Stephen and Cara are often out of their depth and very much fan boys/girls of certain brands. Joe, Jack and James all contribute good content.

As with any content platform, read what you like and ignore (or laugh at) what you think is ridiculous. I thought some of their interviews for the Hodinkee 10 celebrations were quite entertaining. I tend to ignore any comment they put out ref. Tudor...the bias force is too strong on that brand😀

Awww, was someone’s VIP card revoked and they’re throwin’ a wittle fit???

Compare this to his slobbering over the release of the ceramic Daytona. No issues there when he and buddy John Mayer were clearly moved to the top of the list, but suddenly “Rolex can’t deliver shit.” IE: Can’t deliver to him, and now it ain’t cool.