Forums Latest Members
  1. Candle00 Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    342
    Likes
    1,071
    Hi all,

    After the reissue at Baselworld was announced, I've been looking for an original Longines 6b/159.

    I've come across this piece online. It's a cal. 12.68N and the serial number indicates that it was was manufactured in approx. 1943.

    I see that there are no military markings. Was a civilian version ever issued? The case also has the 'Acier Inox' engraving and it's my (limited) understanding that it was common for the earlier models to be alloy. Has this been recased? Is there anything else that seems amiss?

    As always, appreciate any insights.

    LG 1.jpg LG 2.jpg LG 3.jpg LG 4.jpg LG 5.jpg LG 6.jpg
     
    thelinendial likes this.
  2. adi4 Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    648
    Likes
    2,085
    I believe there were civilian versions in stainless steel, and I have seen a couple sold in the past few months I've been looking at these. Looks to be all correct to my eyes. There was some discussion on the re-issue thread around these if you want to reference that. I'm sure some of the other folks here will chime in soon with much more insight than myself.
     
    Candle00 likes this.
  3. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    7,447
    Likes
    20,950
    Yes, something's amiss. This case is alloy as shows from the wear. So the case back has got to be an incorrect replacement.
     
    thelinendial, Candle00 and adi4 like this.
  4. adi4 Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    648
    Likes
    2,085
    Good catch, I was too focused on the dial, hands, and movement I guess... :(
     
    Candle00 likes this.
  5. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    2,698
    Likes
    4,639
    Based on what I have seen, the case-backs of alloy/non-stainless steel examples of this reference (4830) are always signed "acier inox". Here is another 22'313 for reference: https://www.ebay.com/itm/202160901422Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

    @Candle00 Nothing amiss, IMO. Many of these do not have military markings.
     
    Syrte, adi4 and Candle00 like this.
  6. Candle00 Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    342
    Likes
    1,071
    Thanks for all the insights. So, the current listing describes it as 'military'. Technically, that could be considered inaccurate if indeed civilian versions were issued and this is an example of one?
     
  7. GuiltyBoomerang Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,727
    Likes
    5,927
    Some were also surplus military that was sold to the market post war, as well as reusing parts to make a civilian watch without markings.

    Military descriptions are kind of an oddball since that could be "military style" or "issued" etc.
     
    Candle00 likes this.
  8. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    2,698
    Likes
    4,639
    Depends on your definition of a military watch. Here is a discussion on the topic: https://omegaforums.net/threads/when-is-a-watch-a-military-watch.66310/ Though this example may not strictly qualify as a military watch, the Longines reference 4830 was designed specifically for the British Air Ministry.
     
  9. GuiltyBoomerang Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,727
    Likes
    5,927
    Kind of like my CK2292 which has had the movement number cut out and has no 6B/159 caseback marking:

    20180204_095312.jpg

    20180204_095258.jpg

    20180204_100308.jpg

    20180204_100320.jpg
    It could be military, it could be civilian, only in this case I will never know as the movement number is missing.
     
    Candle00 likes this.
  10. bubba48 Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    1,556
    Likes
    7,914
    It seems that the caseback engravings have been roughly abraded. Military issued presumably.
     
    Candle00 likes this.
  11. GuiltyBoomerang Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    1,727
    Likes
    5,927
    Referring to the OP's watch or my one @bubba48? Your eyes are certainly sharp regardless ;)
     
    Candle00 and valjoux72 like this.
  12. cchen Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    573
    Likes
    1,149
    This version is correct - chrome case with stainless steel back which is how they were issued. Looks like the military markings may have been polished off.
     
    Candle00 likes this.
  13. bubba48 Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    1,556
    Likes
    7,914
    To the OP of course ;)
     
    Candle00 and GuiltyBoomerang like this.
  14. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    7,447
    Likes
    20,950
    Interesting observation, thanks for pointing it out.
     
    Candle00 and DirtyDozen12 like this.
  15. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    2,698
    Likes
    4,639
    As far as I can tell, the first iteration of this reference had all stainless steel cases. I have seen a number of these early pieces with military markings.
     
    Candle00 likes this.
  16. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    7,447
    Likes
    20,950
    There were all stainless steel cases for sure.
     
    DirtyDozen12 likes this.