Help wanted Omega Seamaster 166.010

Posts
7,634
Likes
61,438
What do you think @Spruce?
Nice of you to ask. I’m a sucker for a nice case, face and hands, and it looks good from that perspective but I’m not generally overly worried about the workings when I buy because they’re not seen and a good watch repairer can usually sort the movement out - something that’s not so easy with the case, face and hands.

I’m not much of one for bracelets so I won’t comment on this one. @SkunkPrince makes all the points.

That said, as @JimInOz points out the rotor is mucky and you can see in the case back where it’s been dragging through the black marker so, if you go for this it’ll need a service, probably sooner rather than later, and you should factor this cost in with the price.
 
Posts
27
Likes
11
I think I have seen all very valid points! Learned a lot from reading all of your feedback and concerns. Much appreciated.

I will pass on these two and wait a little longer. Must say that I’m getting more and more enthusiastic. I’ll keep sourcing...
 
Posts
7,634
Likes
61,438
Bear in mind that all these watches are, give or take, 50 years old and none are likely to be perfect - certainly not at the prices you’ve been looking at. (I confess that I’m the same - I buy watches to wear not to store). So, inevitably, you’ll probably opt for a watch that isn’t perfect but that you feel good about.
(A bit like marriage)
 
Posts
27
Likes
11
Haha except with watches you are allowed to have multiple loves instead 😉.

Like I mentioned before, I wonder if there is an optimum price point. Where above a certain price the noticeable increase in quality will only be marginal even if the price increases significantly.

Do you think there is such a price point for these Seamasters as well?
 
Posts
7,634
Likes
61,438
My ceiling, which I can exceed if I want to, is £500.
I reckon that at that price the watch will possibly hold it’s value. Also, if I lose it or break it etc, I reckon I can take the hit.
 
Posts
27
Likes
11
Fair enough!

Reason for asking is that I’m definitely able to invest more, but simply lack the knowhow about what the ceiling should be to have the right balance between value and quality.
 
Posts
7,634
Likes
61,438
Fair enough!

Reason for asking is that I’m definitely able to invest more, but simply lack the knowhow about what the ceiling should be to have the right balance between value and quality.

Well, I think the main difference is that whilst some of us do ‘invest’ in watches, many of us, of whom I’m one, just like them as a piece of eye candy.

The investment issue isn’t of any great concern to me. I’m generally pleased if a watch I acquire is worth what I pay for it, but it’s not an investment. For me it’s a fun hobby.

The other point is that it’s always fun to get a nice watch at a lower price, but I want to be able to strap it on without worrying about the actual value and, in my case, without it looking too valuable or ostentatious.

I think that prices, if not values, are on the up. There’s not as much around as there was (depending on what you’re collecting) in the £250 region, but there’s quite a few nice watches out there in the £500 range.

The added factor is that if your budget is £2,500, it’s more fun IMHO to accumulate 5 watches than one.