Help on Omega cal 266

Posts
55
Likes
7
Will save everyone. I am considering the purchase of this gold omega and would like to get your opinions regarding the dial. Is it reprinted?
Thank you in advance
 
Posts
517
Likes
542
Nice watch, really like honeycomb dials.

By no mean am I an expert, but would tend to vote repainted, based on the fact that the Omega logo appears not as neatly written compared to other examples I have seen (especially the « E »). It could be the picture quality though as we approach the limit of pixels. There are a few examples in the private sales forum to compare to. Honeycomb dials aren’t perfect in nature, so it’s not always simple to draw the line.

Suggest you wait for other more experienced people to give their opinions as well!

Yours vs. Another example from the sales forum



Edited:
 
Posts
20,110
Likes
46,770
All I can say is that I would not buy the watch based on those photos.
 
Posts
11,236
Likes
19,689
Better photos would help, but if pressed I’d say the dial’s original
 
Posts
825
Likes
1,444
I'd vote redial based on the E and G also the tiny minute hashs between 7 and 8 o'clock.
 
Posts
16,161
Likes
34,110
IMO it's a redial based on the Omega and the minute marks. Many of them are angled and not directly aligned with the radius, as well as being of variable lengths.

It's not a collector grade watch, but if it looks good on your wrist and you like it and can afford it, only you can decide.
 
Posts
825
Likes
1,444
Redial, the G is not right, also look at the inconsistency of the minute marks between 1 and 2.
 
Posts
55
Likes
7
I don't understand what's wrong with the minutiae. In my opinion the font is right,.it has slightly different g but after 70 years I think it is normal. Here are some examples taken from dials claimed to be original
 
Posts
55
Likes
7
Here is another from a well-known European auction house. Same reference
P.s. the crown is original but has lost some plating.
 
Posts
20,110
Likes
46,770
It sounds like you are happy with it. Congrats.
 
Posts
631
Likes
785
I was able to get a better picture. I think it is original
There seems to be something weird about the hour hand close to the center of the dial. Damaged? Filed?
 
Posts
55
Likes
7
There seems to be something weird about the hour hand close to the center of the dial. Damaged? Filed?
Probably some oxidation
 
Posts
55
Likes
7
Update: Here are some photos taken with a magnifying glass. It is evident that , if not done at the right angle, the honeycomb dial can create doubt.
 
Posts
1,279
Likes
2,836
I would agree with the verdict of redial - the second track appears to be off, as like another user has mentioned the intervals are not all facing the precisely correct direction, and the logo too is incorrect. The G as pointed out is wrong, and there is too great a gap between the applied logo omega symbol and the printed OMEGA part of the logo.
 
Posts
55
Likes
7
This is an example that can be a lesson in evaluating vintage dials: I opened the watch ,removed the glass and disassembled the dial together with my watchmaker, we examined it thoroughly with the loupe and it is 100℅ original.
Unfortunately with honeycomb dials if you don't take the picture at the correct angle the glass is likely to create distortions in the font.
In addition I have to say that all these reasons you have found are inconsistent in my opinion, in order to be able to evaluate the originality of a dial it is not enough to look at the distance or anything else but you have to study it thoroughly and especially compare it with dials of the same decade.

Thank you all!
 
Posts
13,355
Likes
31,492
I opened the watch ,removed the glass and disassembled the dial together with my watchmaker, we examined it thoroughly with the loupe and it is 100℅ original

Have you removed the dial from the movement to examine the back of the dial?