Mark020
··not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawerYou'll have to wait for that. Pics are on my other laptop which is currently being fixed
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Mark, i think, your dial is not original as well. see the bleeding of the upper and lower half circle into the subdials ; look at the subdial at 4 o`clock. . that is not Omega from that period. kind regards. achim
No, Mark. Show the magnified part, where the black half circle runs into the subdial.....not the inner coloured ones. Kind regards. Achim
what can i say? i had quite a few of these with multi coloured dials over the last 30 years. Now different posters here show always the same example in the catalogue and in person. same watch. one example to proof the same point? just stating, that it is complete original? I love these watches, i`d be more than happy, if that gold one has the all original dial. there are more than one problems; look at Mark 020 magnification of the 3 o`clock subdial. look, how thick the 25 is printed. anyway, it is always difficult to judge from pictures. different angles can show different outcomes, that are not there when handled in person. Great watches . enjoy them. kind regards. achim
just stating, that it is complete original? I love these watches, i`d be more than happy, if that gold one has the all original dial. there are more than one problems; look at Mark 020 magnification of the 3 o`clock subdial. look, how thick the 25 is printed. anyway, it is always difficult to judge from pictures