Help needed for possible buy

Posts
3,590
Likes
8,196
So, could have been better (18k, overall condition) but darn sure could have been worse!
How are you feeling?
Plans? (off to the sympathetic watchmaker, I hope!)
 
Posts
561
Likes
3,967
Thanks, so that鈥檚 based on the serial in the caseback馃憤
 
Posts
561
Likes
3,967
So, could have been better (18k, overall condition) but darn sure could have been worse!
How are you feeling?
Plans? (off to the sympathetic watchmaker, I hope!)
Hey, I don鈥檛 care much if it鈥檚 18k or 14k馃槈 It was a bargain and my research proved me (partly) right. All thanks to the OF馃憤
 
Posts
561
Likes
3,967
Hey, I don鈥檛 care much if it鈥檚 18k or 14k馃槈 It was a bargain and my research proved me (partly) right. All thanks to the OF馃憤
So in short: quite happy馃榾馃槑
 
Posts
23,619
Likes
52,511
Thanks, so that鈥檚 based on the serial in the caseback馃憤

If this question is with respect to the manufacturing date, the 1953 date is based on the 13.7M movement serial. I don't find case markings to be particularly helpful for dating Omega watches from this era.
 
Posts
561
Likes
3,967
Ah, of course. So what about the meaning the serial in the caseback?
 
Posts
23,619
Likes
52,511
Ah, of course. So what about the meaning the serial in the caseback?

I'm not sure exactly what you are asking, but I think the watch is fine, i.e. I have no reason to believe that the movement was re-cased. If you really want more detailed information, you will have to pay for an Extract from the Omega archives, but I don't really see much upside.
 
Posts
561
Likes
3,967
There are no worries from my side. I was wondering why the different serial number in the caseback?
 
Posts
23,619
Likes
52,511
There are no worries from my side. I was wondering why the different serial number in the caseback?

Omega case and movement numbers don't generally match.