Help Me Identify My First Omega Seamaster Please !

Posts
12
Likes
7
Hi everyone,

I just purchased my first Seamaster. The seller claims it is between 1950-1959, however I am unsure on how to tell. I have attached all the images I was provided with below.

Also, it is referenced as 2846-8 SC, Cal. 501. Are these references correct?
I believe the watch and the strap are real but am unsure as it is my first. Please help me authenticate this watch and if it’s real please tell me more information if you can. Thank you for all the help ❤️
 
Posts
1,567
Likes
12,406
Did you try Google search for 2846-8 SC, Cal. 501.? There must be something..
 
Posts
12
Likes
7
Did you try Google search for 2846-8 SC, Cal. 501.? There must be something..

when I do it comes up with so many similar watches but never these ones shown in my photos. That’s why I question if it’s real but I can’t do much since I already purchased
 
Posts
13,483
Likes
31,778
Yes it's genuine, ca 1958. Unfortunately the dial has been refinished.
 
Posts
1,567
Likes
12,406
Reference number (2846/2848) is written inside of the case back. Unfortunately, dial has been poorly redone.
 
Posts
12
Likes
7
Yes it's genuine, ca 1958. Unfortunately the dial has been refinished.

I assume this decreases its value right?
Would you be able to give me an estimated price I should’ve paid I now feel I overpaid
 
Posts
12
Likes
7
Reference number (2846/2848) is written inside of the case back. Unfortunately, dial has been poorly redone.

thank you Zapatta for your help. Do you have an estimated price I should’ve paid for this watch? I think the answer might break my heart but I’d like to know if you can 😀
 
Posts
47
Likes
56
Pass this one. İ really love 2846-2848. Specially two tone dial. But this is a bad redial. Buckle is not original. You can find many others for good prices with time.
 
Posts
12
Likes
7
Pass this one. İ really love 2846-2848. Specially two tone dial. But this is a bad redial. Buckle is not original. You can find many others for good prices with time.

Thank you for the advice. Unfortunately I already paid for this so I can’t pass. Can you explain why the dial is bad? I don’t know what to look for and why it’s bad. Please educate me 😀
 
Posts
1,480
Likes
3,025
Rather than members supplying you with a punch list of all that's wrong with it, I found it much more helpful to study genuine watches and known redials to pick out the differences myself. Now, I'm much better at it than I was.
 
Posts
13,203
Likes
22,963
Why don’t you let us know what you paid?

The redial is poor as the quality and consistency of print isn’t there. A collector wouldn’t buy it at all I’m afraid. Value possibly around 250£/€/$.

That said, if you like it and didn’t pay too much it’s a fine daily beater. It’s simply the noob tax that most of us paid when we first started collecting vintage watches.
 
Posts
4,817
Likes
12,197
thank you Zapatta for your help. Do you have an estimated price I should’ve paid for this watch? I think the answer might break my heart but I’d like to know if you can 😀

The dial makes up a significant portion of the value of the watch, but the dial is not the only issue. The case has been polished enough to remove all the original finish and edges, the movement looks a bit tired and dirty and there is pitting on the case as seen here:

x1539833-36b9b525f91813bbbef826ee4a871cde.jpg.pagespeed.ic.aEHZIaocxe.webp

The dial has uneven and overly thick text. The script is also wrong, it has a round S like in later 60s Seamasters where it should have a coat hook S, like on this dial (taken from a dealer's page);

IMG_0010.jpg
 
Posts
12
Likes
7
Rather than members supplying you with a punch list of all that's wrong with it, I found it much more helpful to study genuine watches and known redials to pick out the differences myself. Now, I'm much better at it than I was.

thank you for the advice Josiah I understand what you’re trying to say. I will do so 😀
 
Posts
12
Likes
7
Why don’t you let us know what you paid?

The redial is poor as the quality and consistency of print isn’t there. A collector wouldn’t buy it at all I’m afraid. Value possibly around 250£/€/$.

That said, if you like it and didn’t pay too much it’s a fine daily beater. It’s simply the noob tax that most of us paid when we first started collecting vintage watches.

I paid about €550/£490/$595. So an overpay but as you said the noob tax. I will do my due diligence for the future thank you for being honest
 
Posts
12
Likes
7
The dial makes up a significant portion of the value of the watch, but the dial is not the only issue. The case has been polished enough to remove all the original finish and edges, the movement looks a bit tired and dirty and there is pitting on the case as seen here:

x1539833-36b9b525f91813bbbef826ee4a871cde.jpg.pagespeed.ic.aEHZIaocxe.webp

The dial has uneven and overly thick text. The script is also wrong, it has a round S like in later 60s Seamasters where it should have a coat hook S, like on this dial (taken from a dealer's page);

IMG_0010.jpg

I see what you’re saying. Thank you sm for the help, it’s my fault for being sloppy with my first purchase and rushing it. Thank you for the examples and pictures too
 
Posts
4,817
Likes
12,197
Hopefully you didn't pay too much @Yjamil123. Is it possible to return the watch at this point? If not you have paid what we call the newbie tax. You have learned from the experience. Many of us here have made similar mistakes.

Don't be afraid to ask questions here before you buy in the future.
 
Posts
12
Likes
7
Hopefully you didn't pay too much @Yjamil123. Is it possible to return the watch at this point? If not you have paid what we call the newbie tax. You have learned from the experience. Many of us here have made similar mistakes.

Don't be afraid to ask questions here before you buy in the future.

Hey there,

luckily I think I have time to refund my order, so I requested to do so. Thank you for the kindness and for everyone’s help as well, I will learn from my mistakes !
 
Posts
4,817
Likes
12,197
Hey there,

luckily I think I have time to refund my order, so I requested to do so. Thank you for the kindness and for everyone’s help as well, I will learn from my mistakes !

Good news, and I should have said before: Welcome to the forum! I would watch the Private Sales section here, and this thread as well: https://omegaforums.net/threads/rec...-not-for-inquiries.1790/page-357#post-2112317
You won't be able to post in the sales subforums until you have 200 meaningful posts, but you can always send a private message to a seller. Good luck, and be patient. Sometimes it can take years to find the watch you are looking for.
 
Posts
45
Likes
20
https://omega-constellation-collectors.blogspot.com/
I'm new at this as well. the site above will be helpful. There's a pdf that shows case number and caliber correct matching to the year and lot's of other information. It's a bit overwhelming but fun too. In case you didn't know, your dial (again, I'm still a newbie) might contain Radium - I just wanted to let you know. Some collectors seek it out, some don't care, some would not want it...just thought you should know.
 
Posts
17,943
Likes
37,523
https://omega-constellation-collectors.blogspot.com/
I'm new at this as well. the site above will be helpful. There's a pdf that shows case number and caliber correct matching to the year and lot's of other information. It's a bit overwhelming but fun too. In case you didn't know, your dial (again, I'm still a newbie) might contain Radium - I just wanted to let you know. Some collectors seek it out, some don't care, some would not want it...just thought you should know.

The redial has been done well after radium was banned from use as evidenced by the use of the round S script.
It may be tritium lume on the indexes, which is much less hazardous then radium.