Help identify my Omega 1944

Posts
37
Likes
7
Hi can anyone give me any more info on this 1944 omega, maybeva military watch or military style. The case back number is odd and I cant find any others out there with this serial number. Some photos attached. Inside of casevavk is numbered 10108146.

Any help is much appreciated.

Cheers

Steve

 
Posts
24,248
Likes
53,993
Serial numbers are unique, so you won't find another with the same number. It may not have a particular reference number. The moment serial number puts it at 1940. Gent's watch with cal 30T2 movement.
 
Posts
3,742
Likes
6,360
Serial is 9.2 mil. That is in the range of a 30T1
I also think the hands are wrong. They should have lume on them to go with hour makers.
Something like this

 
Posts
24,248
Likes
53,993
Serial is 9.2 mil. That is in the range of a 30T1
So do you think the movement has a mixture of parts? 30T2 is visible under the balance. And at first glance, the movement looks consistent in appearance.
 
Posts
24,248
Likes
53,993
Found this one on ebay right now. Very similar shape and the same movement year etc, hands are even thinner with no lume.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/20514199...UoC-cPkTyW&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
That watch is completely different, no similarity at all. Just look at the lugs. In any case, when there is luminous paint on the dial, you can be 100% sure that the hands should also have luminous paint. So that eBay watch clearly has the wrong hands.
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
3,742
Likes
6,360
So do you think the movement has a mixture of parts? 30T2 is visible under the balance. And at first glance, the movement looks consistent in appearance.
All T1's I have are in 9.2 mil.
This one may be an exception.
 
Posts
3,742
Likes
6,360
, hands are even thinner with no lume.
You can see the hour markers but cannot see the hands in the dark, how can you tell time?
 
Posts
24,248
Likes
53,993
All T1's I have are in 9.2 mil.
This one may be an exception.
I wouldn't be surprised if there was some overlap in 30T1 and 30T2 serial numbers.
 
Posts
37
Likes
7
That watch is completely different, no similarity at all. Just look at the lugs. In any case, when there is luminous paint on the dial, you can be 100% sure that the hands should also have luminous paint. So that eBay watch clearly has the wrong hands.
Well its hardly completely different, the lugs are slight different,.
 
Posts
24,248
Likes
53,993
Well its hardly completely different, the lugs are slight different,.
Good, you can see the difference. It is a different reference altogether, unrelated to the OP watch. And the hands are not original. So the point is that it doesn't provide any relevant information about the OP watch.
 
Posts
3,554
Likes
7,591
IMO the font is thick
This is because the dial is 2 layers galvanical execution - some call it "gilt" which is a bit misleading as there is not any gold colour - I call it "galvanic sandwich" instead.
On these dials the "print" always looks a bit wider or less defined/sharp
 
Posts
3,554
Likes
7,591
IMO the serial number is perfectly fine for an early T2 as its 9.24xxxx
Most T1 I have encountered are 9.1xxxxx
Even my SC T1 are in lower serial numbers in the range of 9.18.... or 9.19.....
 
Posts
37
Likes
7
Any idea of value. Ts fully working and actually keeping excellent time.
 
Posts
17,939
Likes
37,514
Please post pictures, not links.