Help Finding My 1st Vintage Omega

Posts
10
Likes
5
Greetings, long time reader, first time poster here.

A while back I tried on a vintage Seamaster and it got me started on a search for one for myself.

I'm in the market for a 60's Omega Seamaster and was hoping to get some guidance from you. A few criteria:
- Less than US $1,000
- 500 caliber movement
- 34mm to 38mm
- Stainless steel case
- White or off-white dial
- Able to accommodate a leather strap
- Water resistant
- I'm not too fussed if it has a date or not
- Don't have a preference if it's a chronometer or not

Based on these criteria, I think the following reference models would work:
- 165.001, 165.002, 165.003, 165.009
- 166.001, 166.002, 166.003, 166.010, 166.011, 166.067
- 167.070
- 168.022, 168.024

Any of these references that you prefer, any of these you would stay away from or any that I might have missed? Really appreciate any guidance that you would be able to share!
 
Posts
7,361
Likes
58,715
Well Stefan, and welcome to OF.

I think your question is a bit too general.

Good idea to ask before you buy but I think it’s probably down to you to work out what you want to get and check it out here before you buy.

I will make two suggestions.

First, when you find one you’re interested in, post photos and as much information as you have. It’s easier for us to look and comment.

Second, and this a a personal view, concentrate on the 552/565 movements. They’re very reliable and in plentiful supply.
 
Posts
20,544
Likes
47,359
Sounds good to me, it's mainly a matter of personal preference and hunting down a good one.
 
Posts
10
Likes
5
That's really helpful, will definitely do so, as soon as I see something interesting. Just trying to get my head around all the reference models.

Is there a big difference in the availability of parts for the 562, 551 and 564 vs the 552/565. Based on my limited knowledge the 562 was the international version, are there big differences between that and the movement sold in the US?
 
Posts
544
Likes
585
My first thought is that you could narrow down the style of case / lugs you prefer and/or dial specificities, if needed (numbers, markers, special dial, texture etc). This might be more useful than references per se.
 
Posts
13,415
Likes
31,554
Is there a big difference in the availability of parts for the 562, 551 and 564 vs the 552/565. Based on my limited knowledge the 562 was the international version, are there big differences between that and the movement sold in the US?

Just the number of jewels really.

Looking at our dearly departed Dr Ranfft chart for this series of movements may help, all based on the same base caliber.

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Omega_550
 
Posts
10
Likes
5
That's really helpful, thanks for sharing!

Saw this one on Chrono24, its reference 166.067 with a 565 movement. Seems to check most of my requirements and looks in good shape, to my eye. Just not sure about the case shape itself, anyone have any experience with this version? If you have any thoughts please let me know.

Here is the link https://www.chrono24.com/omega/seamaster--id31296140.htm

Many thanks!

 
Posts
4,947
Likes
18,341
That's really helpful, thanks for sharing!

Saw this one on Chrono24, its reference 166.067 with a 565 movement. Seems to check most of my requirements and looks in good shape, to my eye. Just not sure about the case shape itself, anyone have any experience with this version? If you have any thoughts please let me know.

Here is the link https://www.chrono24.com/omega/seamaster--id31296140.htm

Many thanks!

Yes, i had a couple. But the shape of the case is not the best design ever. I prefer the case of the 166.010.
 
Posts
4,947
Likes
18,341
Although it's not on your list but the 166.009 is also a nice one...
 
Posts
10
Likes
5
Haha small world. It is nice but I think I also prefer the 166.010 shape as well... a little hard to know without trying them on.
I like the 166.009 as well, just didn't come across that one in my research yet, I'm adding it to my search.
Thanks!
 
Posts
946
Likes
3,540
Greetings, long time reader, first time poster here.

A while back I tried on a vintage Seamaster and it got me started on a search for one for myself.

I'm in the market for a 60's Omega Seamaster and was hoping to get some guidance from you. A few criteria:
- Less than US $1,000
- 500 caliber movement
- 34mm to 38mm
- Stainless steel case
- White or off-white dial
- Able to accommodate a leather strap
- Water resistant
- I'm not too fussed if it has a date or not
- Don't have a preference if it's a chronometer or not

Based on these criteria, I think the following reference models would work:
- 165.001, 165.002, 165.003, 165.009
- 166.001, 166.002, 166.003, 166.010, 166.011, 166.067
- 167.070
- 168.022, 168.024

Any of these references that you prefer, any of these you would stay away from or any that I might have missed? Really appreciate any guidance that you would be able to share!
Welcome aboard and happy hunting!
 
Posts
1,069
Likes
3,711
Any of these references that you prefer, any of these you would stay away from or any that I might have missed? Really appreciate any guidance that you would be able to share!
I prefer this design
I’m going to put in another vote for the 166.010/168.024 family (which would include the non-date versions) because there’s a lot of choice out there and because the design is a great place to start, whether you end up like the rest of us as a collector or choose sanity. Get one on a beads-of-rice bracelet, because why wouldn’t you.

The 166.010 design sits right in the middle of an aesthetic that kind of clarifies your taste in watches. You can draw a straight line from there to almost any other classic watch design, whether it’s toward the Rolex Datejust and that kind of thing, or back in time to the 1950s-style Seamaster line, or go up and down in size between older 33-34mm designs or bigger watches, especially chronographs. On yet another axis, the watch is kind of like a sport coat, in the way it has its origins as a rugged tool but now signifies sporty fashion, so you can go from there to tool watches or the opposite way to more dedicated dress watches.

If you ever end up getting a second watch, the 166.010 Seamaster line kind of anchors your rotation. It’s dressier than a tool watch or most chronographs, sportier than any dress watch, has a cooler vintage vibe than more modern designs and looks like a 1960s Corvette compared to older ones. If you get one and find it too middle-of-the-road, you can always sell it and get something more in the direction you’re inclined to, or keep it in your collection because you’ll always enjoy going back to it after wearing pretty much anything else. That’s the way I see it, at least.
 
Posts
1,796
Likes
3,677
I’m going to put in another vote for the 166.010/168.024 family (which would include the non-date versions) because there’s a lot of choice out there and because the design is a great place to start, whether you end up like the rest of us as a collector or choose sanity. Get one on a beads-of-rice bracelet, because why wouldn’t you.

The 166.010 design sits right in the middle of an aesthetic that kind of clarifies your taste in watches. You can draw a straight line from there to almost any other classic watch design, whether it’s toward the Rolex Datejust and that kind of thing, or back in time to the 1950s-style Seamaster line, or go up and down in size between older 33-34mm designs or bigger watches, especially chronographs. On yet another axis, the watch is kind of like a sport coat, in the way it has its origins as a rugged tool but now signifies sporty fashion, so you can go from there to tool watches or the opposite way to more dedicated dress watches.

If you ever end up getting a second watch, the 166.010 Seamaster line kind of anchors your rotation. It’s dressier than a tool watch or most chronographs, sportier than any dress watch, has a cooler vintage vibe than more modern designs and looks like a 1960s Corvette compared to older ones. If you get one and find it too middle-of-the-road, you can always sell it and get something more in the direction you’re inclined to, or keep it in your collection because you’ll always enjoy going back to it after wearing pretty much anything else. That’s the way I see it, at least.
+1 on this great advice. Look at buckets of them so you can identify a good case and clean dial. Lots of these from Japan on eBay good way to peruse the reference No need to settle for poor case or dial. Happy hunting!
 
Posts
7,361
Likes
58,715
Lotsa 166.010s on Chrono24 at a range of prices.

This was under £650 in 2021 and the seller pointed out minor dial damage at the 10 indices but I never notice it and I bought it as a wearer, not an investment.

Edited:
 
Posts
10
Likes
5
That's great advice @krogerfoot totally agree. Let the search continue! At the moment I can't find anything at the price/condition that seems to make sense. Will post anything that I come across which looks interesting. Thanks again for all the advice. It is very much appreciated!
 
Posts
10
Likes
5
Greetings, saw this watch on Chrono24: https://www.chrono24.ca/omega/16601019703141--id31685962.htm

Nothing jumped out to me, other then the fact that it is probably a 168.024 vs a 166.010. Not as cheap as some of you procured yours for but doesn't seem outrageous either at ~US$850. Really appreciate any insights you might have. Many thanks!

31685962-9163cfr8dcgrt3q742dleqmt-ExtraLarge.jpg
 
Posts
20,544
Likes
47,359
Looks ok except for the caseback polishing.