Help - f300 - but what is it?

Posts
5
Likes
1
Hi folks

Came across this forum whilst doing some research on my Omega. It was my grand father's watch, given to me 30 years ago on his passing.

My grandmother said it was as old as me which dates it to 1969. I think it's perhaps a little newer though, early 1970's?

I've looked at the really helpful electric watches website thanks to other posts on this site. It doesn't feature though.

Attaching some photos.

Case ref is CD 198.001 which isn't in any of the model examples. No guarantee this is the original case back though. Other searches suggest it is a Seamaster but there is nothing on the dial saying this. Believe the CD preface means it is the gold cap version

Serial number is 32008267.

Would welcome any info you have. It will be passed to my son in good time and I'd like to give him as much information as I can.

Strap is replacement but it still has the original clasp. Had to rescue this year's back as an unscrupulous jeweller kept it when replacing the strap!

Still working fine, date sticks but this seems to be one of the known issues according to electric watches.

Many thanks
 
Posts
642
Likes
338
Nice watch, it's got a "Coiffe d'Or" (CD) heavy plating too.
 
Posts
5
Likes
1
Thanks folks

@Peemacgee - first link is the 198.0001 whereas mine is a 198.001, "only" difference being the lack of model name at the bottom. Second link has a photo of the same one as mine against one that says seamaster... Confusing!

@webvan - thank you, didn't know what CD stood for!

@Deafboy - so f300 was a model in its own right? Alongside an f300 seamaster, f300 constellation etc?
 
Posts
6,306
Likes
9,744
Thanks folks

@Peemacgee - first link is the 198.0001 whereas mine is a 198.001, "only" difference being the lack of model name at the bottom. Second link has a photo of the same one as mine against one that says seamaster... Confusing!

The OVDB requires you to put an extra zero in for some reason - no idea why - the reference illustrated is actually 198.001
 
Posts
5
Likes
1
The OVDB requires you to put an extra zero in for some reason - no idea why - the reference illustrated is actually 198.001

Ahh, got it. So even though mine doesn't say seamaster....it is? Unless of course the back plate on mine isn't the orginal one.

This is good fun. I do love those old catelogue scans @Deafboy 😀
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
The F300 refers not to a specific model, but to the fact that the mechanism appears to be an Omega calibre 1260, aka as ESA 9162

I beg to differ. In the early 1970’s Omega lists in their catalogs a model called “Electronic f300 Chronometer”, as distinct from Seamaster, DeVille and Constellation, etc. See the the scans shown below. Later Omega had the f300 name attached to Seamaster and Constellation names. Of course they all refer to the 300 Hz tuning fork movement.
 
Posts
10,440
Likes
16,324
I beg to differ. In the early 1970’s Omega lists in their catalogs a model called “Electronic f300 Chronometer”, as distinct from Seamaster, DeVille and Constellation, etc. See the the scans shown below. Later Omega had the f300 name attached to Seamaster and Constellation names. Of course they all refer to the 300 Hz tuning fork movement.


Well apart from the Cone model you show that has Seamaster on the dial! 😉

The truth is Omega played fast and loose with f300 marketing. All the f300 watches with just a few exceptions (eg the SMf300 120m diver) are made to exactly the same spec in terms of accuracy and water resistance, usually 30m. Don’t get hung up on what family is written in the dial. Some case numbers are just branded f300. Others have Seamaster, Geneve, Connie or even Deville versions. There are even Speedsonics of course.

I have seen an all steel Seamaster marked 198.001, they are out there but as I say it’s irrelevant what is on the dial really.
Edited:
 
Posts
513
Likes
340
thank you, didn't know what CD stood for!
This is for goldcapped in french letters as you may know Biehl/Bienne is in the french speaking part of Switzerland.