Help dating my Seamaster De Ville Automatic

Posts
5
Likes
2
Hi there, good folks of the internet!

Some years ago, my grandma gave me a really nice watch, and i haven't really appreciated it until recently.

I've been able to narrow it down to a 60's model, but I'm interested to know what year specifically the watch was made.



I have looked around the web trying to identify it myself, but i haven't seen any other watches where the "waterproof" is inside the circle on the back side. I don't really know if this is significant or not, either.



Anyone out there with the knowledge to help me out?

BTW, I know the backside could do with a little shine up 馃榾
 
Posts
5
Likes
2
I think you're on to something here, vbrad26. It's impossible to spot with the naked eye, but i got an angle that might help.

To me it looks like "NF 67 32262"

Do you know what it means?

 
Posts
43
Likes
64
Could it be a military number marking (pure guess BTW..) I looked at the 1967 Seamaster Devilles and there are a lot that look like this..
 
Posts
5
Likes
2
@DMass, I suppose it could be in theory, but i think it's unlikely. My grandfather served in WWII, and was already a middle aged man in 67. And as far as i know, his service ended with the war.

I looked at 67 De Villes, and some of them look exactly like mine, so I'm gonna assume mine is as well. Until I'm told otherwise, of course.

Thanks for the help, guys! 馃榾
 
Posts
4,611
Likes
23,493
Take it to a watchmaker who can get the caseback off for you.
That will be the only way to really know.
 
Posts
614
Likes
836
@DMass, I suppose it could be in theory, but i think it's unlikely. My grandfather served in WWII, and was already a middle aged man in 67. And as far as i know, his service ended with the war.

I looked at 67 De Villes, and some of them look exactly like mine, so I'm gonna assume mine is as well. Until I'm told otherwise, of course.

Thanks for the help, guys! 馃榾
The answer to "when was it made" is inside the caseback, on the movement.
You might be able to remove the caseback yourself, but a MUCH better idea would be to take it to a watchmaker and ask them to.

The serial number alone will tell you, within a couple years, when it was made. (There's a bit of uncertainty). To know FOR SURE it's date of manufacture, you would need to contact Omega and request an Extract of Archive- for that you'd need to know the serial number anyway.
 
Posts
614
Likes
836
Take it to a watchmaker who can get the caseback off for you.
That will be the only way to really know.
Is this a front-loader?
If so.... I'm thinking the mystery numbers could be just be a watchmaker's code.
That's a really annoying place to put it, obviously.
But if getting the case apart were a significant hassle, someone might just put it there.
 
Posts
23,544
Likes
52,338
Yes, the movement is removed from the front on this watch, so you will need to get assistance from a professional to read the serial number on the movement.
 
Posts
2,082
Likes
2,840
Very nice condition and looks all original!

Get yourself a 18mm watchband 馃槈
 
Posts
4,611
Likes
23,493
Yeah to me it initially seemed like a date. 3-22-62. For those of us who format the date as such lol.
 
Posts
1,540
Likes
2,635
'NF 67' may refer to the year. I've noticed a lot of De Villes post-67 have the "waterproof" script inside the medallion, rather than engraved on the outside. That said, the most reliable way to date the watch is definitely by checking the serial.

Another note: I can't tell from the first image in the black inserts are paint or onyx. They look like physical inserts from some angles, but the 12 o'clock markers suggest they might be painted. If they're painted, then that would definitely place the assembly of the watch after 67. If they're onyx, the watch might be from early 67 or late 66.
 
Posts
5
Likes
2
Thanks for all the replies, you guys! A lot of great information. I will definitely have a professional open it and extract all the relevant numbers.

I live in Norway, and we do the dates the other way around here, @vbrad26. So either it was dated on the 32nd of feb 1962, or it was done abroad, or maybe it means something else entirely. The plot thickens.

I'm looking at 18mm watchbands as we speak, @Passover. Neat observation, I hadn't noticed at all.

@Caliber561 It's not really something I'm qualified to say for sure, but to me it looks painted.
I tried taking some macros, but unfortunately they didn't turn out really great due to me being a sub-optimal photographer.


Anyways, thanks again 馃榾
 
Posts
2,121
Likes
1,307
Not a watchmakers mark. Usually done on the inside and 32262 is not a zip code

67 could be a date as the watch falls into that range

Who knows

DON
 
Posts
1,540
Likes
2,635
Thanks for all the replies, you guys! A lot of great information. I will definitely have a professional open it and extract all the relevant numbers.

...

@Caliber561 It's not really something I'm qualified to say for sure, but to me it looks painted.
I tried taking some macros, but unfortunately they didn't turn out really great due to me being a sub-optimal photographer.


Anyways, thanks again 馃榾

The easiest way to check whether the indexes are onyx or not is to look at the sides. The difference will be pretty clear, as I've sketched out here: (pardon the handwriting)


馃憤
 
Posts
33,560
Likes
38,238
The easiest way to check whether the indexes are onyx or not is to look at the sides. The difference will be pretty clear, as I've sketched out here: (pardon the handwriting)


馃憤
That is actually a really nice drawing, definitely save that for future reference man
 
Posts
5
Likes
2
The easiest way to check whether the indexes are onyx or not is to look at the sides. The difference will be pretty clear, as I've sketched out here: (pardon the handwriting)


馃憤

Ah, i see!
Had to zoom all the way in, but this looks like it's set into the index.
That means it's onyx, witch makes it roughly a 66/67 model, if I understand you correctly?
 
Posts
1,540
Likes
2,635
Ah, i see!
Had to zoom all the way in, but this looks like it's set into the index.
That means it's onyx, witch makes it roughly a 66/67 model, if I understand you correctly?
Yes, that would be my guess. On Constellations, I believe the change occurred after the 24 million serials, which would place it your watch around 1966 going by the same rules. It's possible the watch was built in 66 and sold in 67, although that level of information around production isn't normally recorded. Most just go by the movement serial number, which indicates the year the movement was made.