Help, corrosion on hands

Posts
432
Likes
741
I have a 6234 which I really like but the hands have a lot of oxidation/corrosion. Can they remove the corrosion without disturbing the Lume? I would not want to damage the lume in the hands at all but wondering if someone on OF has had the same problem and what they did?
TIA
 
Posts
503
Likes
736
Some watchmakers are specialised in cleaning hands and making new lume seems old... but not sure your watch need it!
See below, first pics before restoration, then during and after
 
Posts
466
Likes
1,388
Holy cow. That is a gorgeous piece. Can you share more photos? 馃榾

I鈥檓 not sure if you have a watchmaker in mind, but you might want to ask a Rolex specialist what can be done. I鈥檝e worked with Phillip Ridley (https://ridleywatchmakers.com/), and he is amazing.
 
Posts
432
Likes
741
Some watchmakers are specialised in cleaning hands and making new lume seems old... but not sure your watch need it!
See below, first pics before restoration, then during and after
he did an amazing job, the before and after pictures are amazing. I want to keep it original so replacing the lume for me would be out of the question.
Thanks for sharing your pictures and experience.
 
Posts
24,261
Likes
54,029
I think that the whole dial and hand set shows very consistent aging and wear, and is very appealing overall. So it seems pointless to address the corrosion on the hands without doing the same for the dial markers, and honestly I don't think I would risk it. It could easily go wrong. Many shops are specializing in making old watches look new again, but some of us still appreciate an honest vintage watch.
 
Posts
503
Likes
736
I think that the whole dial and hand set shows very consistent aging and wear, and is very appealing overall. So it seems pointless to address the corrosion on the hands without doing the same for the dial markers, and honestly I don't think I would risk it. It could easily go wrong. Many shops are specializing in making old watches look new again, but some of us still appreciate an honest vintage watch.
+1
 
Posts
503
Likes
736
he did an amazing job, the before and after pictures are amazing. I want to keep it original so replacing the lume for me would be out of the question.
Thanks for sharing your pictures and experience.
So let hands as they are, your watch is a beauty like that, no need to remove corrosion 馃榾
 
Posts
432
Likes
741
Holy cow. That is a gorgeous piece. Can you share more photos? 馃榾

I鈥檓 not sure if you have a watchmaker in mind, but you might want to ask a Rolex specialist what can be done. I鈥檝e worked with Phillip Ridley (https://ridleywatchmakers.com/), and he is amazing.
I attached a couple of more photos. I bought the watch last summer and it came from the original owners family. I got it from the original owners son-in-law. He was selling it to give his father-in-law money he needed for health reasons. I very nice story and a very nice son-in-law.
 
Posts
432
Likes
741
thanks for your input
QUOTE="Gui13250, post: 1398166, member: 61838"]So let hands as they are, your watch is a beauty like that, no need to remove corrosion

馃榾
 
Posts
432
Likes
741
I think that the whole dial and hand set shows very consistent aging and wear, and is very appealing overall. So it seems pointless to address the corrosion on the hands without doing the same for the dial markers, and honestly I don't think I would risk it. It could easily go wrong. Many shops are specializing in making old watches look new again, but some of us still appreciate an honest vintage watch.
@Dan S, All very good points...Thank You
 
Posts
993
Likes
1,870
I really don't think you should touch it. That's a huge part of the value when it comes to something correct.
 
Posts
1,484
Likes
8,113
John, the aging of hands consistent with aging of hour markers. I wouldn鈥檛 take any chances. I鈥檇 be more annoyed if hands and markers looking decades apart. That will take a hit on valuation for sure. It鈥檚 a beauty.
 
Posts
13,698
Likes
53,501
My view ...special watch, special hands. I'd leave them be. I've made similar decisions.
 
Posts
432
Likes
741
My view ...special watch, special hands. I'd leave them be. I've made similar decisions.
That seems to be the consensus, thanks so much for every ones inputs.
 
Posts
148
Likes
160
An honest, aged example you have there. Most watches do have some sort of oxidation on the hands, and this is part of the vintage appeal. In any watch that has aged uniformly, you will not find the steel still shiny. The oxidation is a part of its age - appreciate it and leave it as it is. Most collectors will prize that over a watch that has been fixed to look shiny and new.
 
Posts
432
Likes
741
An honest, aged example you have there. Most watches do have some sort of oxidation on the hands, and this is part of the vintage appeal. In any watch that has aged uniformly, you will not find the steel still shiny. The oxidation is a part of its age - appreciate it and leave it as it is. Most collectors will prize that over a watch that has been fixed to look shiny and new.
Thanks for the input and agree about having the hands shiny in contrast with the rest of the dial.