Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Hum... this is strange for sure.
The eagle head is usually on the other side of the back in more recent watches, but it is usually on the inner side on watches of this period (middle of the 1940's). So that's okay. The Omega logo looks good as well. However, I do not like the "1" in the case number. Not sure about the PF either: looks a bit off. But it is hard to tell from those pics.
There are two possibilities as far as I can tell. First, this is a fake French made case. The maker would have then add an improper international (or Swiss) hallmark. It would be strange though. Second, this is a genuine French made case that has been also hallmarked with a 750. I guess it could have been added afterwards, for custom reasons, as France did not sign, at that time, international agreements about gold trade and hallmarks.
Do you have more info about this watch? Are there orther eagle heads on the case? There should be at least one on the main part of the case - it was not mandatory for the bezel.
Please would anyone engaged with this thread please tell me who << PGF >> are? 📖 That is, the letters inscribed inside the diamond shape at the top of the inside of the caseback in the OP photo? That logo has been driving me mad for a couple of years now, so you would be kindly assisting my mental wellbeing - thank you! 👍
Please would anyone engaged with this thread please tell me who << PGF >> are? 📖 That is, the letters inscribed inside the diamond shape at the top of the inside of the caseback in the OP photo? That logo has been driving me mad for a couple of years now, so you would be kindly assisting my mental wellbeing - thank you! 👍
I think you are maybe correct to assume the 750 was added later, likely at the assay office. I believe this is the case (pardon the pun) previously discussed about mine.
I recently found this which has added a new twist to my search ...
http://info.hktdc.com/alert/eu0416a.htm
As a rule, jewellery items produced in or imported into France must be engraved with two hallmarks:
the producer's or responsible person's hallmark i.e., the specific hallmark of the producer or the importer in France which is meant to identify him; and
the so-called certifying hallmark which, until 1 July 2004, had to be engraved by either the State, an accredited body or the producer himself, certifying the percentage of gold, silver or platinum in items of jewellery.
I will elaborate at a future date but I’m inclined to think that different makers, importers, accredited bodies etc will have all had their own way of doing things during this period and sometimes there were anomalies
Please would anyone engaged with this thread please tell me who << PGF >> are? 📖 That is, the letters inscribed inside the diamond shape at the top of the inside of the caseback in the OP photo? That logo has been driving me mad for a couple of years now, so you would be kindly assisting my mental wellbeing - thank you! 👍
I am glad you eventually embrace the hypothesis I framed about your watch!
I’ve not actually said that François. I believe mine and the OP’s cases show anomalies from the norm, that is not to say both aren’t correct.
I also think experts knowledge is accepted as correct based on what has been seen to date, so when something different turns up they question its originality
Sorry if I misunderstood you, but I thought you said your watch had been afterwards stamped with the owl in an assay office. Which is basically the hypothesis I made.
I think you did misunderstand as you only came to that conclusion after I managed to take a clear magnified image of the Owl. I had already stated ( from the very first post I may add ) that the case carried an import Owl hallmark stamp and that the case will have been examined by the assay office and then given that hallmark as proof of the case’s gold standard. So you agreed with my hypothesis, not the other way round. Anyway this is all for another thread, so back to this one ...
The OP’s case is “French made” no doubt, the misaligned 1 doesn’t make it fake and the .750 stamp may be an anomaly but again does not mean it’s incorrect