rahul718
·I own both a 9300 and a 145022. For what it's worth, having the latter has not diminished my appreciation of the former one bit. I've found the 9300 to be reliable and accurate and I love the watch as a package. I think the stainless steel 9300 as pictured above is a really successful blend of traditional look-and-feel with modern tech. With such an interesting mechanism residing inside, the inclusion of a display back is a genuinely enjoyable feature of the co-axial Speedy. The sapphire crystal, automatic movement, date display, and ability to easily track a second time zone with the combined chrono subdial add practicality and functionality. The 44mm case of the newer model has presence without being garish (at least on some wrists). Now, of course, the 9300 movement did not go to the moon. I get it. But then again, neither did the 1861/1863 😉 I'd encourage you to try them both on if you've not already done so. They do wear a little differently.
Thank you.
If you could only have 1, which one would it be out of those two and why?