Grail Acquired: Omega Admiralty 166.038, Full Set

Posts
237
Likes
365
Nice looking admiralty, I've been looking for a blue one for quite some time now.
Do you know if the dials with anchor came first?
Or are the ones without a service dial?
 
Posts
1,003
Likes
1,599
After much searching and agonizing, here it is, the SM 300 companion in the rare, black military dial, 17mm "longhorn" configuration. Complete with the big crown and the lovely orange sweep-second. Came with the original purchase papers and box.

1971-2 Omega Admiralty
Cal. 565
166.038

An apt demonstration of the beauty to be found in asymmetry.

More on these fine pieces and their various iterations here: https://omegaforums.net/threads/comprehensive-omega-admiralty-thread.69037/page-15#post-1775783 (and thanks to the OF community for the wise advice, as always!)

Nice one! do you know why the movement number does not coincide with the one written on the booklet?
 
Posts
1,003
Likes
1,599
Well, that is strange because it has exactly the same amount of digits as a movement.
I think that in some cases production date differs from the selling date.. a watch could stay in the shelf for months or years sometimes..
 
Posts
8,888
Likes
28,353
Nice one! do you know why the movement number does not coincide with the one written on the booklet?

I suppose the two options are:

1 - The movement was swapped at service (there seems to be very strong evidence that Omega did this for a period of time.

2 - The papers don't go with the watch.
 
Posts
999
Likes
5,864
I suppose the two options are:

1 - The movement was swapped at service (there seems to be very strong evidence that Omega did this for a period of time.

2 - The papers don't go with the watch.

Or option 3, which is that the number refers to something besides the movement, and it's just coincidence that it's the correct number of digits. The year of the movement in the watch itself does match the date of sale on the papers (1972), so #2 seems highly unlikely (what are the odds of finding papers for that model at all, let alone those from the exact year matching the serial # of the movement?). And #1 doesn't make sense for the same reason -- why write up papers that refer to one movement, then swap out the movement prior to sale, but don't change the serial # on the papers? There was no premium charged for the papers in any case--the sale price was appropriate for the model and condition. Anyway, I'll ask the original owner and maybe find the answer . . .
Edited:
 
Posts
8,888
Likes
28,353
You misunderstand me on number 2.

During a period of time, Omega used to exchange movements at service, then service the movement they’d taken from one watch, and put it back into another watch at a later date. You’d get your watch back with a serviced movement in - just not the one it left the factory with.

As @flqt-9000 sats, a production year, and a sale year, are not necessarily the same thing - I have watches with a 5 year gap between production by Omega (as indicated by an extract of the archives) and sale by a retailer (as shown on papers that came with the watches).

As long as you weren’t charged a premium for the papers I don’t see it matters hugely - I’m always a buyer for a watch - anything that comes with it is just sprinkles or a cherry on top!

congrats on your pickup.
 
Posts
1,003
Likes
1,599
I suppose the two options are:

1 - The movement was swapped at service (there seems to be very strong evidence that Omega did this for a period of time.

2 - The papers don't go with the watch.

Both hypothesis may be.
I can also add that when I bought the same model I made some research here on the forum and on google and the movement numbers that are documented around are 25M and 27M.
 
Posts
999
Likes
5,864
You misunderstand me on number 2.

During a period of time, Omega used to exchange movements at service, then service the movement they’d taken from one watch, and put it back into another watch at a later date. You’d get your watch back with a serviced movement in - just not the one it left the factory with.

As @flqt-9000 sats, a production year, and a sale year, are not necessarily the same thing - I have watches with a 5 year gap between production by Omega (as indicated by an extract of the archives) and sale by a retailer (as shown on papers that came with the watches).

As long as you weren’t charged a premium for the papers I don’t see it matters hugely - I’m always a buyer for a watch - anything that comes with it is just sprinkles or a cherry on top!

congrats on your pickup.

Ah, that makes perfect sense now!