Gold Speedmaster Racing Blue Vs. Gold Speedmaster Moonwatch Co-Axial 44.25mm

J

Posts

2

Likes

1

Julis

·Feb 23, 2021

Hello everybody!

this is my first post and at first I want to say hello! Very happy That I found this great forum!

I was thinking about my first Speedmaster and came across the Speedy Racing in Sednagold with blue dial and bezel as well as the Speedmaster Moonwatch Co-Axial 44.25mm in Orangegold.

Both look amazing and I want to hear your opinion on both pieces. Maybe someone owns one of these and want to give my some wristshots? 🍿
Thank you and best regards!

 

Posts

984

Likes

1,122

AntonisCy

·Feb 23, 2021

I would choose 9900 over 9300.

 

Posts

1,325

Likes

5,829

rbob99

·Feb 25, 2021

Make sure you try them on. I think both of them are 16.5mm thick, which is too thick for my taste.

 

Posts

536

Likes

763

Alex_TA

·Feb 25, 2021

Well
The dial of the second one is more clean but the Racing is the better watch IMO
9900 vs 9300
Thinner case
Bigger chronograph sub dials
Ceramic bezel vs aluminum
Micro adjustment on clasp (not relevant for strap)

Edited: Feb 25, 2021

 

Posts

266

Likes

390

DNX

·Feb 26, 2021

how can you tell from the pics that the blue is a 9900 and the black a 9300?

 

Posts

408

Likes

355

Bugbait

·Feb 26, 2021

DNX

how can you tell from the pics that the blue is a 9900 and the black a 9300?

"Co-axial Master Chronometer" on blue vs "Co-axial Chronometer" on the black. The "Master" designation here for Omega refers to their METAS certified movements.

 

Posts

259

Likes

232

avidmark

·Feb 26, 2021

The black is stunning!

 

Posts

247

Likes

232

sgrenald

·Feb 26, 2021

My rival high school's colors were blue & yellow, and I went to USC. Even so, I'd say get the blue!

 

N

Posts

5

Likes

7

New moon

·May 23, 2021

Racing definitely