Forums Latest Members
  1. vandesteeg Sep 3, 2019

    Posts
    82
    Likes
    121
    BDA7F804-079C-46B7-8992-0B61190D4448.png 178A6CC4-1CAE-41FD-B08F-6862485EA0A9.png 01AAD674-FB41-4C17-97B3-83673C088744.png F121F500-322E-4351-98F3-FBC6489C495F.png 5D423A93-8BF8-4BE8-924E-9464238F39FA.png Can anyone give me some info about this watch? I don’t know the reference number, maybe a 2691, 2672 or a 2759. But I can’t find any of those in gold.
     
  2. Mark020 not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawer Sep 3, 2019

    Posts
    4,671
    Likes
    6,598
    To start with: it is a redial. And the reference will be in the inside of the caseback :D
     
  3. vandesteeg Sep 3, 2019

    Posts
    82
    Likes
    121
    Why do you think it is a redial? And i know the reference number is in the case back, but i dont have a picture of the inside atm, thats why i’m asking :)
     
  4. Mark020 not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawer Sep 3, 2019

    Posts
    4,671
    Likes
    6,598
    Couple of thing but wrong fonts and markers too sloppy.
     
  5. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Sep 3, 2019

    Posts
    6,531
    Likes
    10,796
    Dial actually looks original to me. The main problem is the overpolished non-swiss case. And these cases do not have a case/model reference number in the inner caseback.
     
  6. BenBagbag Sep 3, 2019

    Posts
    2,820
    Likes
    8,983
    I'm with @MSNWatch. It's legit dial.

    Everyone sure the case is even real gold? How often are there marks on the back of the caseback like that?
     
  7. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Sep 3, 2019

    Posts
    12,570
    Likes
    29,798
    Very common for South American cases.
     
    BenBagbag likes this.
  8. mac_omega Sep 3, 2019

    Posts
    3,175
    Likes
    6,725
    +1 here