Genuineness of a Heuer Bund

Posts
425
Likes
1,721
Hello 😀

I come once again to you in order to have some additional precious thoughts about a Heuer bund that came to my attention.
After some research, I have found that this model isn’t the most forged but a few details rung some bells.

The watch in general looks in very good condition. The dial has a really nice patina.
The writings on the dial look precise.
Some lume is missing on the minute hand.
The movement looks great.




Here are the points that make me suspicious:

I know that there are some dial variations but I have never found another example with stick minute track where the numbers are (5, 10,…). They always are square.



In addition, the military engraving on the back looks suspicious to me. Here again, I have never seen an example where the writings are horizontal (from the 3 o’clock to 9). It is always from 12 to 6.
Also it seems laser engraved. I don’t know if this method was used back then.



I don’t really know what to think about this watch. The engraving on the back is what looks the most likely tampered but I’m not an expert an these.
Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated
Edited:
 
Posts
278
Likes
355
In my opinion it is a putt together watch. Maybe original but full of service parts. Dial is considered a later replacement dial (with incomplete 2,4,8 and 10). However HEUER should be bigger I guess so it’s a bit weird for me also. The case (you forgot to mention this on your assessment) doesn’t have the facets next to the bezel (you can see those on the reference example you showed).

I heard once that there were a lot of spare parts of this model and that a few watch dealers were able to put entire watches together and flood the market with those watches. Pay attention to this


In sum, this would be an example I wouldn’t buy

hope that helped a bit but let other chime in
 
Posts
5,340
Likes
9,072
Search for brown-snout.com . Old, but still one of the best compilations . Your questioned strokes under the 5's and 10's markers exist. The cut off numerals as well. SINN was the dedicated repairer and refurbished many, many for the Government BUND auctions through VEBEG. In the last 30 years we have serviced over 150 examples of all dial, backengraving and movement markings or not , variety. Including the first variant by Leonidas. And I have bought through VEBEG and sold even more. So, if you are 100% sure, that the back is laser engraved, skip it.
Edited:
 
Posts
425
Likes
1,721
Thanks to the both of you 👍
After checking the website, I have found a matching example regarding the dial :

The most likely scenario that happened to this watch would be a refurbishment by Sinn. The case has been replaced (hence the lack of steps on the lugs and the odd looking engraving)
 
Posts
1,040
Likes
5,521
Here a few photos of mine the bezel ring was replaced but everything else original. Been in the collection a very long time when these were priced right. Saw my first Heuer Bund at a NAWCC reginal but by the time I saw it I bought a vintage Omega Speedmaster for 1400 bucks so most of my founds were gone otherwise I would have got that Heuer, but that Heuer was on my want list after that. Got one later that year off German Ebay when you could get better deals there on them than US fleabay. It really stands out. You can see the watch was reclassified with one mark scratched out another one engraved. A lot of sellers will replace the dial if they have a spare 3H dials so they can get a higher price probably what happened to the one you posted. I kind of like the wear and tear on military issued watches shows it's been used as intended in the cockpit of a aircraft,
ZJJLNeh.jpg
QyAFg1P.jpg
mVMwlD8.jpg
 
Posts
5,340
Likes
9,072
Yours is a SINN refurbished one for the German Government auctions. Your Dial has the cut numerals and no small T over 6 o`clock. It is a service dial. The 2. number is a dedication to another part of the German Army/Airforce later in life.
 
Posts
1,040
Likes
5,521
Yours is a SINN refurbished one for the German Government auctions. Your Dial has the cut numerals and no small T over 6 o`clock. It is a service dial. The 2. number is a dedication to another part of the German Army/Airforce later in life.
Here is a better photo of my dial
MTgNJqF.jpg
On the one in the link that has a photo of Sinn refinish one and if you look at mine on my dial look at the sub dials the 8, 10, 2 more cut off so a little different there is swiss mark at the 6. On mine you can see it's well aged. When most militaries service watches they replace dials with service dials like the fat arrow on the Omega 53 a service dial same could have happened to these where it was put back into service after maintenance with replaced dial. There so much we don't know about military watches most of it guess work because none of us were there. So, a lot of it guess work sometimes we are right sometimes we are wrong. Never forget I got a Waltham in a Denison case RAF issued with a 1940 date make with an 840 movement most on MWR at the time said fake later on the forum Proof showed up it written RAF records it was real. We always learn. I just got this to go with my Heuer Bund to make a complete set. Should get it in a week or 2. Kind of cool to find a navigation set for it.
xojuF42.jpg
MNMKltn.jpg
Edited: