FRANCE!

Locked
Posts
7,994
Likes
28,026
Although this forum may, to a certain extent, be open to some public, you can't ignore the composition of its audience and participants. Unless I missed the point, I think the initial purpose was to express sympathy to French hit by this tragedy, because a certain number of my compatriots are members here, not because this forum addresses views on this war and terrorism. That's probably why this thread did not address Syrians who were also killed : they deserve no less support but this watch forum is obviously not the place for this.
Reducing 130 killed to 'a tiny portion of people in France' who attract a disproportionate level of sympathy compared to tens of thousands killed elsewhere is just disrespectful, probably here and certainly now. The dead ones were living people whether Shia or French, not statistics, and compassion has nothing to do with quantities.

This is an "Open Forum". Whatever the initial purpose of the thread, talking about the possible causes of and solutions to such violence is not, in and of itself, disrespectful. Would it have made a meaningful difference to have had two separate threads, one for condolences, and another for analyses? Perhaps for some it would have, but it would strike me as being entirely superficial.

I began to contribute to this thread because someone had been criticized for expressing views that were relevant, and arguably both important and correct. I did not, and do not feel comfortable with any effort to sanitize the thread, but that is completely disconnected to any matter of empathy or respect that I may have for the victims of the attack (not all of whom were French, of course), and those close to them.

I did not ask why Syrians (or Iraqis, etc.) who have been killed were not addressed on this thread. I made a broader point, and it still stands. To my mind - and I know that there are many others who feel this way - the tendency to empathize with those who are most like ourselves, while lacking empathy for those who are different, is a common, deep-rooted and complex human problem. It is also a problem that greatly exacerbates the largely misguided, so-called "war on terror", and frequently catalyzes the type of violence that was, sadly, on display recently in Paris.

With regard to the numbers, everyone reading this understands that when one loses someone close to them - a single person - the impact is typically far greater than that of a much larger number of unrelated people being killed. So yes, it is understandable that for you and others living in France, the impact is particularly powerful. But my point was not that 100 people is a relatively small number, and that therefore their deaths were somehow less important. It was to provoke thought in the above-mentioned (empathy) context, and because the fact that there are many multiples of that number brutally killed each year in the very countries from which many terrorists emanate is extremely important on a number of levels.

Regards,

Tony C.
 
Posts
441
Likes
65
its a sad occurance, but things will probably get worse.
 
Posts
12,107
Likes
40,239
I just wish the world was as accepting and tolerant as we are.

Hear, hear.... all we have to do is find common ground with one another! Here, it's watches, out there - if we cared enough to look, we'll almost always be able to find something in common with people we'd otherwise consider our enemies.
 
Posts
3,581
Likes
8,168
all we have to do is find common ground with one another
I've had many political discussions, I am a Union person and usually in the minority and my best results have always been by simplifying to common ground and then building from there.
(Example, we disagree on the concept of welfare but agree that welfare recipients could contribute by community service, child care, etc.).

We all share the same Earth, have the same aspirations for our family, and many, many recognize the same deity as Abraham.

This can be done.
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,796
83% of all statistics are made up.
Or like we say in consulting. According to the last FMA stats.... Although now more people actually know that means "from my ass"

But it used to work.
 
Posts
106
Likes
41
@VictorAlpha

Im not getting into the broader argument but your historic sense of the Irish people is grossly wrong.

To say they didn't riot, or create havoc and just peacefully actually accepted their fate is just wrong, and depending on how you look at it also does injustice to their struggles.

From the IRA In their land, which also acted internationaly ( like ETA in Spain) to the formation of crime syndicates all over the eastern USA, from the riots and gang wars and the four points crime wars in NYC to Tammany Hall and the government corruption to the Irish Mafia during prohibition...

Look, not judging here, the Irish where considered in the US up to the 20th century one step above the blacks or more like one step to the right... They where vermin. And I'm not even getting into the treatment they got from the British government.... But to say they took it in stride is.... Well, weird, giving the historic record.

The disenfranchised are always a good pool for violence and organized crime, or terrorism... We're not all that different.

I think that you have got your contexts very confused here. I made none of the claims about Irish people that you remarked on. Your observations are completely out of context. The Irish not even the IRA (with whom I have little sympathy by the way) did not embark on a campaign of terror to fundamentally change the social, religious and legal structure of any host country that took in their immigrants via a wholesale campaign of terror and warfare against that countries citizenry. Your argument could encompass the Italians the Jews the Poles and many more nationalities who formed crime syndicates. The Irish through the generations rose up to the highest as well as the lowest stations in their adopted countries as opposed to becoming more radical and insular which is what I was getting at.

For you to equate those with Fundamental Islamic Terrorism shows that you have a weak grasp of the situation at hand. I am not saying that disenfranchisement has nothing to do with it but to try and reduce it to only that is typical of the apologist mindset that has allowed these failed policies to prevailing the first place. I am also not suggesting that every Muslim is a hard line radical BUT the texts which are prevelant in their book if followed by the true believer would give you your first clue as to why many thousands flock to the cause from all over the world. Unlike the Irish and unlike the Basque Separatists.

Again never have the Irish or the Basques threatened the fundamental stability of the world in the way that the Islamic Terrorists do today. Nor have they created enclaves that from gerneration to the next have wholly rejected influence fro the host country
 
Posts
7,994
Likes
28,026
Again never have the Irish or the Basques threatened the fundamental stability of the world in the way that the Islamic Terrorists do today. Nor have they created enclaves that from gerneration to the next have wholly rejected influence fro the host country

While I don't doubt that there is a religious component, I'm not at all convinced that it is as large as you imply. To help clarify, I have a question for you.

Had the U.S., along with other (mostly lapdog) Western powers chosen to treat 9/11 as a police matter, rather than launching the "Global War on Terror", and had they not invaded Iraq or Libya, or rained death and destruction (including countless innocents) in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East, do you imagine that Islamic terrorists would be a current threat to the stability of the world?
Edited:
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,796
Religion is the platform they use, not the actual real motivator here , terrorism is terrorism.

To think the terrorist groups have not rejected the influence of the host country is also not accurate, as In their view Spain or Great Britain are host countries.

Moreover, the Muslim Comunity does not reject the influence of the host countries. A MINORITY of fundamental Muslims do. Even then, ISIS and other groups are not against their host countries, they are at war with these countries so when you join them you're declaring war. But there are plenty of others that don't .

But don't confuse the use of religion as a unifying force of hate with the members of that religion being hateful as a group. And that use of religion as a hate mongering force is not , by any means, exclusive to Islam. Not historically , not even today.

Lastly I am not drawing direct parallels between Vascs, Irish and fundamental Islamic terrorism. There are ideological differences, but also some similarities. They all feel wronged by their host countries and or proxy governments, they all use the emotional pain and hatred as a fuel for recruitment, and they all seek to create terror and use civilian targets to do so.

The point is we can never crush these movements with strength, unless you commit an eternal and totalitarian force to it . The more we fight, the more hate we feed them, and vice versa. The other point is that we fall into racial and social general hatred and profiling. And we start to see all refugees as terrorists of military age, and muslim immigrants as "a force of hate against their host countries" and so forth and so on, not realizing our own humanity.

I remember the ETA bombings in Madrid , 2 blocks from my school they blew a big chunk off Madrid and killed several people... It didn't feel any different , not at all. Not to the dead, and not to those that remained behind.

Terrorism is terrorism. On England, Oklahoma , Madrid or Paris. It's a horrible tool of hate and war that does not discriminate. Be it. a social, religious, political or ethnic platform, the model is the same
 
Posts
2,828
Likes
4,720
Stop it! :whipped:

You know better.

Time to get real people.
gatorcpa
Sorry for being so impertinent.
I just thought they deserved a mention given the context of this thread, along with the tourists killed in Tunisia, and let's not forget the Malaysians either.
 
Posts
415
Likes
678
No one is forgetting any group that has been killed by terrorist actions. My opinion is that those who oppose the Syrian refugees coming to the states have the "Chicken Little" disease. Their heads would explode with fear if the world was faced with a real calamity. Think the movie "Independence Day" as an example. If we had to fight a real war, think WW2, they would be hiding under their beds in fear. They would rather scream at the dark rather than turning on a light.
 
Posts
12,107
Likes
40,239
Independence Day is an awesome movie and I would vote for Bill Pullman for President.