Tony C.
··Ωf Jury memberAlthough this forum may, to a certain extent, be open to some public, you can't ignore the composition of its audience and participants. Unless I missed the point, I think the initial purpose was to express sympathy to French hit by this tragedy, because a certain number of my compatriots are members here, not because this forum addresses views on this war and terrorism. That's probably why this thread did not address Syrians who were also killed : they deserve no less support but this watch forum is obviously not the place for this.
Reducing 130 killed to 'a tiny portion of people in France' who attract a disproportionate level of sympathy compared to tens of thousands killed elsewhere is just disrespectful, probably here and certainly now. The dead ones were living people whether Shia or French, not statistics, and compassion has nothing to do with quantities.
This is an "Open Forum". Whatever the initial purpose of the thread, talking about the possible causes of and solutions to such violence is not, in and of itself, disrespectful. Would it have made a meaningful difference to have had two separate threads, one for condolences, and another for analyses? Perhaps for some it would have, but it would strike me as being entirely superficial.
I began to contribute to this thread because someone had been criticized for expressing views that were relevant, and arguably both important and correct. I did not, and do not feel comfortable with any effort to sanitize the thread, but that is completely disconnected to any matter of empathy or respect that I may have for the victims of the attack (not all of whom were French, of course), and those close to them.
I did not ask why Syrians (or Iraqis, etc.) who have been killed were not addressed on this thread. I made a broader point, and it still stands. To my mind - and I know that there are many others who feel this way - the tendency to empathize with those who are most like ourselves, while lacking empathy for those who are different, is a common, deep-rooted and complex human problem. It is also a problem that greatly exacerbates the largely misguided, so-called "war on terror", and frequently catalyzes the type of violence that was, sadly, on display recently in Paris.
With regard to the numbers, everyone reading this understands that when one loses someone close to them - a single person - the impact is typically far greater than that of a much larger number of unrelated people being killed. So yes, it is understandable that for you and others living in France, the impact is particularly powerful. But my point was not that 100 people is a relatively small number, and that therefore their deaths were somehow less important. It was to provoke thought in the above-mentioned (empathy) context, and because the fact that there are many multiples of that number brutally killed each year in the very countries from which many terrorists emanate is extremely important on a number of levels.
Regards,
Tony C.
