Jakeys
·Often the biggest advantage of SACD wasn't the format or higher resolution itself, but the recordings. Alternate masters (or re-masters) of the same albums were more dynamic than their radio-ready counterparts, which were optimized for maximum loudness at all times. These superior mixes are still around on sites like Tidal (or pirated FLAC files people trade). The added dynamic range makes a big difference.
Completely agree, but it's frustrating that standard CD is perfectly capable of that as well, and yet it was a human decision to use that increased range to make everything louder and more compressed. 96 dB range is exceptional, I'm pretty sure it exceeds the realistic range of human hearing unless you're listening in an anechoic chamber and at a volume high enough to give you hearing damage. I guess mastering for SACD was done under the assumption that the format was only going to be used by audio nerds, i.e. a different target market.
One benefit of streaming becoming the standard is that they all enforce loudness normalisation. I expect this will mean mastering for maximum loudness at the detriment of range stops occurring entirely. I doubt anyone is mastering CDs separately from streaming.