Film Compax: A Mystery Solved

Posts
212
Likes
422
Terrible redial.

I am all in for a good quality redial when the dial is gone and not serving its purpose. If I had a Film-Compax I would spare no dime in getting the best quality work.
While it would be a redial.....it would be the best looking Film-Compax out there, if you know what I mean.

An auction house wanting to make money should have the same approach.
It hurts my eyes looking at that dial.....
 
Posts
5,504
Likes
8,593
Possible. If you are an expert at a big auction house and think this is a possible redial I suggest a career switch to second hand car salesman
 
Posts
13,002
Likes
51,889
Looks like the description has been updated ...

[
Hahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa!
 
Posts
1,294
Likes
2,290
Adding 2 Gallet Film Chronographs with slightly different dials.

wow wow wow

absolute stunner of a grail
 
Posts
935
Likes
3,569
Mark, this one has nothing to do with original Film Compax examples 😉
 
Posts
548
Likes
2,549
Mark, this one has nothing to do with original Film Compax examples 😉

But it has an extract from the archives ::facepalm1::
 
Posts
5,504
Likes
8,593
Mark, this one has nothing to do with original Film Compax examples 😉
Why not? Redial it is but 22522 is Film Compax isn’t it?
 
Posts
5,504
Likes
8,593
Agreed but if this is one and it has a FC dial it may be a FC 😉
 
Posts
935
Likes
3,569
You take a cheap, destroyed 22522, you reprint a "film compax" dial et voilà! Money! ahah
 
Posts
5,504
Likes
8,593
But the extract says so 😁

Anyway: the seller did not want to disclose the serial
Edited:
 
Posts
3
Likes
12
Mark, this one has nothing to do with original Film Compax examples 😉

the serial is 1174502 and movement 261324, it’s correct, but a redial sadly.