Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
As far as the Rolex with the 'double 9' dial goes I get very suspicious with these kinds of 'mistakes', especially with Rolex's QC. It would not surprise me if this wasn't a plant by Rolex, look at all the buzz it has created once it was discovered a few years back. A sprinkling of a few error dials in the right places is a good way to showcase your brand and get massive FREE advertising. It could be an honest mistake, or not.
As far as the Rolex with the 'double 9' dial goes I get very suspicious with these kinds of 'mistakes', especially with Rolex's QC. It would not surprise me if this wasn't a plant by Rolex, look at all the buzz it has created once it was discovered a few years back. A sprinkling of a few error dials in the right places is a good way to showcase your brand and get massive FREE advertising. It could be an honest mistake, or not.
A sprinkling of a few error dials in the right places is a good way to showcase your brand and get massive FREE advertising. It could be an honest mistake, or not.
Ponzi scheme
Nonsense.
here is the link to the thread on detecting fake guarantee cards
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=716674
i just looked at both of mine and appear authentic. . .to be honest these super fakes are just too hard for even experienced watch people to figure it out
You say nonsense, but does anyone know what the dial pin-hole placement is for the numerals on that Air King dial? Are they the same for the '3', '6' and '9' numerals? In that case you would be able to get a dial that was dressed incorrectly during production that could slip by QC. But wouldn't a smart, detail oriented company like Rolex try to prevent an error like this by making the pin-holes unique for each of those positions so you couldn't get a wrong numeral in one of those three positions? Does anyone have a pic of the back side of the dial to see what the hole placement is? Perhaps they are all the same. I don't think it is nonsense to pose this question.
TRF gives me a headache. WuS gives me a headache. OF no headache. That’s a winner for me.
It's an interesting question. Do you believe a genuine Daytona is worth 70x more than a noob or jf from a technical standpoint? I suspect those of you who think a clone 4130 won't last more than a few years, aren't doing so because you've looked into it or have researched it beyond a cursory YouTube video.
As far as the tells, they're there if you know what to look for and you don't need a loupe. If you aren't up to date on rolex fakes, I don't think it is safe to be buying the world's most faked watch from anyone except an AD or your own mother (depends on your mother I guess!).
I think buyers just need to educate themselves more. This scum isn't the only guy doing it. There's a lot of evidence on Instagram, forums, etc.
There are some tear downs on the web of the 4130 clone. Looking at the construction, I think you can get about 10 uses out of the chrono function before something goes wrong. If you leave the chrono alone, it might keep time for a while. Just don't drop it.
70X is an exaggeration. You should compare the price of a "super clone" vs the price from an AD supplied Daytona not a gray market sale. Doesn't really matter though, if you buy a super clone, you might as well be just setting your cash on fire.
We should find one to donate to archer ... for tear down and analysis.