Watch forums have a long history of new members joining to post "interesting" watches in hopes some member will offer to buy. It's not stated in the initial post but that's the goal. Oftentimes these are fraudulent posts. So people here are skeptical. And rightly so.
Of course, it’s right to be skeptical, but I would handle it intelligently by asking for more photos or descriptions. I wouldn't just jump to conclusions and refuse to listen to reason. In any case, I was trying to see if this mistake had happened to anyone else; I haven't put the item up for sale because I really like it.
Ancora 0% di testo umano.
Che cosa c'entra la tua ditta con tutto questo?
Comunque, a tutti gli altri auguro una buona giornata!
Honestly, even if this WERE completely verified/had a letter from Omega's president himself saying it was real and a mistake...
This would be worth less than the original to me. Why would I want an imperfect one? Yes, people who do certain types of collecting pay more for mistakes, but watches like this one aren't that sorta thing.
If it were me, I'd send it back to Omega and let them 'fix' it with a correct caseback.
Quale dei due?
Of course, it’s right to be skeptical, but I would handle it intelligently by asking for more photos or descriptions. I wouldn't just jump to conclusions and refuse to listen to reason. In any case, I was trying to see if this mistake had happened to anyone else; I haven't put the item up for sale because I really like it.
Praticamente nessuno usa il punto e virgola nei post dei forum. Perché l'intelligenza artificiale sembra avere questa abitudine di usare una grammatica fuori luogo?
Thanks for the reply; I'm currently trying to figure out the best course of action, and one option is sending the watch to Omega, who would replace the case back with a new one. My only concern is that the new case back might not feature the limited edition numbering.
Cat picture time?
I see no reason for you do anything more with the watch except wear it and enjoy it.
You will know that it's a special piece due to the engraving anomaly and if others notice/comment on your watch while you're wearing it they may be interested, but if the observer mentions "issues" or suggests a fake just nod, smile and move on.
Regarding comments related to Superintelligence. Many of us have experienced newer members using A.I. output to post on the forum, either in initial questions or in response to others. We find it very tiresome having to point out the errors/omissions/bullshit in their A.I. generated output.
Another issue is that translation from one language to another used to be "not perfect but understandable" and while not reflecting the format/style/expression of the original language it was acceptable. With the primary translation machines moving to more A.I. based interpretation we're starting to see "A.I." in simple conversation translations.
This may explain some of the "A.I. bias" in this thread.
"Its a poor craftsman that blames his tools"
