TexOmega
·I buy what I like, silly me.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
If anything, titanium develops surface scratches just as easily as steel, so I'm really not getting it being promoted as a superior choice when it comes to that. I prefer it because with a Ti bracelet, a watch isn't a boat anchor, but it's hardly imperceptible. It also wears pretty easily if subjected to any sort of constant movement (think bracelet links moving against each other). Titanium has high tensile strength but not so great wear resistance. The only way in which it is superior to steel is with weight. I like titanium watches, and would definitely be interested in more being offered that way, but let's not kid ourselves that it somehow prevents pretty much any of the OP's issues with steel.
It's 2021. Not everyone is on board with the changes.
This makes me wonder, are all watch cases made of the same steel? Knife people have strong preferences for certain steels, why don’t watch people seem to care?
This makes me wonder, are all watch cases made of the same steel? Knife people have strong preferences for certain steels, why don’t watch people seem to care?
Every year, at least 100 watch brands present us with a smorgasbord of mixed materials and we vote for the winners with our dollars.
To bring another Forum fact to bare
Who's a Gumpalump here?
🤨
I see you posted this on WUS as well. Do you work for some Ceramic lobby or something ?
As you say: I don't care if you want your 60s re-issues and vintage inspired pieces in steel.
... I don't care that your preference is for Ceramic or any other material....
[Nor] should you be belittling them as being ignorant, nor insinuating they are somehow backward because they prefer X over Y.
doh!
I see what you’re doing! Sarcastic grumpalumping about there being no grumpalumps. A+ 👍
PS:
Opinions of course differ, and maybe I’m misreading it, but the above seemed at least fairly ripe for a little bit of watchfeelings-grumpalumping.
And you “liked” it, so... 😗
No big deal!
The data you presented states otherwise. SS is 40% by value is actually the largest...
And the "bimetallic" category is probably mostly SS.
From the prerogative of OPs original post, essentially, people only want SS -> I would think one might lump together (A) precious and (B) bi-metalic (largely, precious + SS).
But if they didnt want to lump them together, it's why I said "largest or single culprit" - on a value basis.
You wrote this:
"SS isn’t really the largest or single culprit:"
It is not the "single" but is certainly the "largest: according to the data you posted. If you meant to write something different than what you did, that's fine...