- Posts
- 368
- Likes
- 253
vlaspri
·Nice pictures, never spotted the difference in dial finishing. To me the grainy finishing looks ways better!
Ed White Dial Finishing Comparisons - 1964 vs. 1965
- Posts
- 138
- Likes
- 103
worldwidewes
·I personally prefer the '64. The '65 dial just looks a bit worn to me and I don't really know why. I think the watch just pops a bit with the smoother dial.
On another note, that blue bezel is absolutely incredible. One of my goals is to get a 321 Speedmaster with a non-black bezel. The 145.022 I currently have has a ghost bezel that's faded to a dark gray that looks silver under bright sunlight, but I've seen Speedmasters with dark green and dark blue bezels that look incredible. The dark green is especially spectacular.
Thanks so much for sharing this!
On another note, that blue bezel is absolutely incredible. One of my goals is to get a 321 Speedmaster with a non-black bezel. The 145.022 I currently have has a ghost bezel that's faded to a dark gray that looks silver under bright sunlight, but I've seen Speedmasters with dark green and dark blue bezels that look incredible. The dark green is especially spectacular.
Thanks so much for sharing this!
- Posts
- 1,060
- Likes
- 5,783
Twocats
··Married... with childrenI am trying to accelerate my “falling in love with vintage watches phase" it's not there yet but it's coming. With that in mind I choose the 64 as I prefer the texture of the dial and it looks in better condition to my utterly novice eyes.
- Posts
- 246
- Likes
- 322
Geme81
·even if both are beautiful I like more the finishing on -64
