Forums Latest Members

Don't fall for a Fake vintage Omegas! Post them here (Not for questions)

  1. Vercingetorix Spam Risk Aug 24, 2018

    Posts
    3,266
    Likes
    5,255
    I find it hard to believe that the fakers could afford “crystal glass” much less the luxury of it being printed on the dial.
     
  2. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Aug 26, 2018

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,233
  3. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Aug 27, 2018

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,233
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  4. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Aug 29, 2018

    Posts
    12,619
    Likes
    29,915
  5. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Aug 29, 2018

    Posts
    12,619
    Likes
    29,915
  6. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Aug 29, 2018

    Posts
    12,619
    Likes
    29,915
  7. JanV Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    907
    Likes
    2,467
    This Speedmaster MK4.5 is coming up for auction now in Germany, this is WHY you need a shot of the movement! Anyone see anything that’s “off” with this watch?
     
    0062B5D0-33EC-4D87-94E7-8947605F11E9.png EADBB330-1B62-4DDF-9D4B-F86CBCCFD8FD.png B60BDA13-6452-4BE8-B506-B3A31154408B.png A159B964-8C41-4709-81D8-B000960FDA1B.png 0A366802-E039-4F3F-9F6C-BFA9B12C79B3.png D37E6AE3-0D91-4676-AF27-048AF722F32A.png
    michael22 likes this.
  8. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    15,490
    Likes
    32,377
    ?
    What am I missing?
     
  9. JanV Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    907
    Likes
    2,467
    The movement seems a bit odd... :)
     
  10. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    15,490
    Likes
    32,377
  11. JanV Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    907
    Likes
    2,467
    Oh crap, my mistake completely. I was expecting to see a calibre 1040 in this watch. So I really need to have a better look and fact checking next time.
    My apologies. Should I delete my post completely?
     
    Edited Aug 30, 2018
  12. michael22 Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    1,790
    Likes
    1,897
    It's an educational couple of posts, no need to delete. IMO
     
    JanV likes this.
  13. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    15,490
    Likes
    32,377
    No need to. If I deleted every post where I'd goofed up people would never know how smart I'm actually not.

    You never stop learning.
     
    michael22 and JanV like this.
  14. rcs914 Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    2,502
    Likes
    3,593
    Sigh... I love this quote from the auction: "The watch needs a fresh battery. I have seen this watch run and it has a very consistent second hand flow. I do not know much about the watch other than I am sure it is authentic, but am unsure if there is a model number I am missing, but any questions you may have I am happy to answer to the best of my ability."

    No dude, no it isn't authentic. It's a hideous awful fake. And it's an automatic, so pretty sure a fresh battery isn't going to help anything. Flagged.

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-007-Speedmaster-Professional-Watch/183407126223Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

    s-l1600 (13).jpg

    s-l1600 (14).jpg
     
  15. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    12,619
    Likes
    29,915
    Reported and removed.
     
    Edited Aug 30, 2018
    rcs914 likes this.
  16. seawiz Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    0
    New to the hobby and trying to learn as much as possible. I came across this watch on Goodwill Auctions a couple of weeks ago. I contacted their customer service and mentioned a couple of things that didn't look right. They pulled the ad and sent it to Authenticate First to be checked. They were told its real and have relisted it. Goodwill claimed that they couldn't get the back open. They also won't test the gold content even though they mention the methods they use to test it on other items.

    Original listing: https://www.shopgoodwill.com/Item/56098842

    New listing: https://www.shopgoodwill.com/Item/56733014

    My concerns:
    1. The lettering and minute marks on the face are fuzzy around the edges and indistinct.
    2. The date doesn't line up with the window.
    3. Some of the "Gold" appears to have worn off. (I can't find any reference to a gold plated or filled version of this watch)
    4. The stamping on the clasp looks a little "off".
    5. Most of these that I can find pictures of have a serial number on the back just under the observatory.
    6. I'm not sure if the hands are correct for this watch.

    It might be a lousy redial on an authentic watch the fact that they haven't opened it and won't test the gold makes me suspicious.

    What do you think?


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  17. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    15,490
    Likes
    32,377
    X350 XJR likes this.
  18. seawiz Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    0
    Yeah. That's the way to support the hobby and attract new members to this site. Your "let's berate noobs who accidentally post in the wrong place" circle jerk must be very rewarding for you two.
     
    Edited Aug 30, 2018
  19. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    15,490
    Likes
    32,377
    It was meant as a polite pointer that this thread is for verified fakes.

    All you had to do was create a thread and request assistance from the moderators to move this post to your thread.
     
    michael22 and ac106 like this.
  20. seawiz Aug 30, 2018

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    0
    This wasn't meant to be polite at all. Polite would have been to say "Welcome to the site and thanks for your question. It might get a better response if posted to this other thread."

    This was a passive-aggressive jab that you and your buddy seem to enjoy applying at the drop of a hat.