- Posts
- 7,624
- Likes
- 21,860
Syrte
·One of the pros for Rolex vs. Omega for a long time now has been their thinner and slightly smaller watches. Why hasn’t Omega made the proper adjustments?
And I may be in the minority here but promote the De Ville line. Instead of cutting costs there make it your cutting edge line like it was with the introduction of cal. 8500.
Agree the DeVille line looks great, funny it takes design cues from the 1940s instead of the 1960s or whenever it was actually created. 15000 euros though, not sure they’re « cutting costs »?
Also I have finally found an Omega watch I would find beautiful and suitable as a unisex or ladies watch - a new release, 34mm solid gold Aqua Terra with Moonshine gold. Modern Omegas have always been completely out of reach for me, but the price tag of 18000 euros takes the cake. Also unavailable in stores.
Seems like they’re taking a page from the Rolex book. Beautiful watch though.
DeVille below for comparison.
