Do you wear vintage on vintage bracelets? Fear VBF?

Posts
362
Likes
594
105.012-65 on its 1506
53525026237_dca3729d28_k.jpg
Wow it could be a rare "Armstrong" dial!

Cheers
 
Posts
1,976
Likes
9,455
Okay I am easily influenced, thank you.
Today I’ll try my 145.022-71 on a marked 1175 with 640 ELs
 
Posts
362
Likes
594
Okay I am easily influenced, thank you.
Today I’ll try my 145.022-71 on a marked 1175 with 640 ELs
Hi Dave,
the bracelet would need some TLC, LOL.
Cheers
 
Posts
5,082
Likes
15,701
Before I develop a robust fear of wearing vintage bracelets, I’d like to first hear some horror stories about the bracelets failing. Should I be doing an annual inspection, and what would I look for?

Until then…

 
Posts
1,430
Likes
2,957
Generally, I don’t wear bracelets and I prefer soft leather or fabric NATO straps. All my vintage watches have the original metal bracelets… I just set them aside and wear the watches with leather or a Seiko Seichu straps… super comfortable.
I’m not so afraid of VBF, but rather VBBU… vintage bracelet bang up, VBHP… vintage bracelet hair pull.

Edited:
 
Posts
1,085
Likes
3,763
Just as I was scoffing at the idea that anyone should fear their vintage bracelet coming apart, I discovered the hard way that my shadily sourced Thai alligator strap’s buckle had lost its integrity, if it ever had it.


Fell right off my wrist on the train. I’m lucky that I realized it when it happened and that the train was not so crowded that it is literally impossible to reach into your pocket, much less bend down to pick something up off the floor.

Pictured below is the temporary fix that will probably hold me for the next few years.


Obligatory:
 
Posts
1,085
Likes
3,763
I’m not so afraid of VBF, but rather VBBU… vintage bracelet bang up, VBHP… vintage bracelet hair pull.

The vintage 1116 bracelet on my 145.0016-68 has efficiently removed all the hair within its range on my wrist, so it’s quite comfortable now.
 
Posts
230
Likes
533
I'm a bit with the OP on this. Depends on the condition of the original bracelet. Some vintage bracelets are so worn out, don't fit, rattle about or, worst still, the clasp fails. I try then to replace as much like-for-like as possible with modern replacements...however, the originals are kept safe, for prosperity.

The Zenith Defy came with the original ladder bracelet and now wears the Forstner version... the clasp was gone on the OG and kept busting open...






The Mk II is way better on the Uncle 1162. The OG doesn't fit my wrists...the US is much better fitting and the clasp is great.



The Cosmic 2000 had a knackered 1171, replaced with a new 1171 from Omega...a special watch as it came from my father, so gets luxury treatment.



I guess it depends on the condition. Original bracelets in good nick are sound...but sometimes new is better.
 
Posts
16
Likes
50
Here’s a serious hair puller. 1953 Rolex Turnograph on a 1953 expanding Gay Freres oyster bracelet. Pluck, pluck, pluck. It just doesn’t look right on anything else

52795110721_52766a6879_h.jpg
 
Posts
308
Likes
745
Yes, with one exception and that's my Ranchero. Because the case condition on this one is as close to NOS as you can get for a 1958 watch, I thought that a vintage bracelet would look mismatched with the case. The solution was provided by JWRosenthal who suggested a modern Omega 3010 beads of rice bracelet. Turned out to be the perfect match.
1727440-efbf003087fa924bbc63a0abfc0d6a78.jpg
I’m curious how the new bracelet feels on a vintage watch. I’ve not done this but have generally thought new bracelets were much heavier than vintage (and vintage watches). Does it feel much different? Also is this bracelet something you bought through Omega?