Green_P0ison
·Hello everyone,
I would like to ask your opinion about an issue that I got with a watch that I got serviced recently.
I’ve bought a few months ago an omega 166.0117 in perfect shape. The case had a splendid rose/red tone gold patina everywhere (sorry I don’t have photos..). The problem with the watch was that the gasket liquidified and had to be changed (as seen in the picture below) along with a service. My watchmaker being sick he suggested me to go to one of his friends that is also a watchmaker. So I went there and dropped a few watches that needed a service with a note that the watches shouldn’t be polished nor having the dial touched (for precaution). Today I took back the watches, and everything is perfect apart that the 166.0117 does not have any patina left (which makes me a bit sad). At first I thought that the watchmaker may have polished the watch a bit. But then I realised that none of the other watches were touched. After thinking a bit about it I realised that the watch was certainly put in a ultrasonic bath and this would be the explanation of the watch losing its patina, could that be possible? (sorry if what I’m saying doesn’t make sense). I can also mention that the watch still has some microscopic scratches (as seen on the pictures below).
Here are the pictures of the watch :
Before :
After :
It’s mostly for curiosity that I’m asking as it’s not a big issue for me that the watch has losen it’s patina. But what I want to be sure is if I can trust the watchmaker as I have other watches that would need a service (still didn’t asked him what happened because I don’t want to annoy him asking ridiculous questions as he’s really a nice guy and would probably feel bad about it). So what do you think, am I correct considering that the ultrasonic cleaner is guilty for making the watch lose Its patina?
Thanks in advance for your precious opinions!
I would like to ask your opinion about an issue that I got with a watch that I got serviced recently.
I’ve bought a few months ago an omega 166.0117 in perfect shape. The case had a splendid rose/red tone gold patina everywhere (sorry I don’t have photos..). The problem with the watch was that the gasket liquidified and had to be changed (as seen in the picture below) along with a service. My watchmaker being sick he suggested me to go to one of his friends that is also a watchmaker. So I went there and dropped a few watches that needed a service with a note that the watches shouldn’t be polished nor having the dial touched (for precaution). Today I took back the watches, and everything is perfect apart that the 166.0117 does not have any patina left (which makes me a bit sad). At first I thought that the watchmaker may have polished the watch a bit. But then I realised that none of the other watches were touched. After thinking a bit about it I realised that the watch was certainly put in a ultrasonic bath and this would be the explanation of the watch losing its patina, could that be possible? (sorry if what I’m saying doesn’t make sense). I can also mention that the watch still has some microscopic scratches (as seen on the pictures below).
Here are the pictures of the watch :
Before :
After :
It’s mostly for curiosity that I’m asking as it’s not a big issue for me that the watch has losen it’s patina. But what I want to be sure is if I can trust the watchmaker as I have other watches that would need a service (still didn’t asked him what happened because I don’t want to annoy him asking ridiculous questions as he’s really a nice guy and would probably feel bad about it). So what do you think, am I correct considering that the ultrasonic cleaner is guilty for making the watch lose Its patina?
Thanks in advance for your precious opinions!








