Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Very unlikely that it moved once it weas installed. They are put on very tightly, so unless this was some form of defective hand, I doubt that is what happened.
Which is the truly accurate photo?
This is why the check is done with the movement out of the case. When the watch is fully assembled, I find it is better to look down the length of the hand from the bottom (6 o'clock side) and sort of sight down the hand to get a better idea of the alignment.
I've serviced hundreds of these, and there are occasionally times when I look at a hand that I swore I put spot on, and it looks off to one side depending on how I hold the completed watch in my hand.
$7,000 dollar watches aren't luxury, that's just a fact of economics. Omega can say they are 'high grade and precise' but with high automation and their production level they can't spend a lot of time on each watch making sure it is 'perfect'. They are built to a cost. Either accept that or move on to a digital smart watch. I know someone who bought a Roger Smith tourbillion/perpetual calendar pocket watch, a true hand made watch. Perfection is the name of the game at this level. Shortly after receiving it the watch stopped, a screw in the tourbillon mechanism had fallen out and jammed the movement. Back to the Isle of Man it went where it was quickly attended to, Roger said he didn't use enough loctite on the screw when he assembled it. "Sorry about that. It won't happen again." The world is never precise when it comes to man made items, no matter how much care is taken. Either accept that or you'll be perpetually unhappy and unsatisfied, not a good way to go through life.
Is Terry short for Terrence, Teresa or perhaps Karen? If you are daft enough to take a ~$3k hit because of a misplaced sense of entitlement and indignation then good luck to you. That’ll show em’ Perhaps the pugnacious approach is a way to generate enough posts to make it to 200 and list the watch here. Have another log on the fire from me in that case as I’ll happily take it off you for peanuts.
This is a very common theme with this kind of poster. They need validation and when they don't get it, we are all brand shills, or not discerning enough, or whatever. It happens over and over again...
Ah yes, the classic “everyone who disagrees with me must be emotionally needy” take. You guys recycle that line like it’s a personality.
It’s funny how the same handful of people who accuse others of needing validation are the first ones to form a little support group every time someone challenges their groupthink. Maybe look in the mirror before diagnosing others - the projection’s getting a little obvious.
Is Terry short for Terrence, Teresa or perhaps Karen? If you are daft enough to take a ~$3k hit because of a misplaced sense of entitlement and indignation then good luck to you. That’ll show em’ Perhaps the pugnacious approach is a way to generate enough posts to make it to 200 and list the watch here. Have another log on the fire from me in that case as I’ll happily take it off you for peanuts.
Enough of the counterpunching.
What have you decided to do?
You say this, but the majority of your posts here and at WUS are exactly that...even the one 2 before this...
We get it, you are unhappy. Your fight is not with us, but with Omega, and they capitulated - congrats, you won!
At this point it's obvious OP just likes to argue with people.