- Posts
- 649
- Likes
- 839
speedy4ever
·So, does this change the way one would evaluate originality? Are certain dials expected on specific subreferences within the 105.003 family?
Different versions of 105.003 dials ?
- Posts
- 405
- Likes
- 2,020
- Posts
- 405
- Likes
- 2,020
Pianist
·I think people need to post which reference year comes with which mark dial so we can establish a trend.
Yes it's a good idea. The serial numbers are also important.
More information about mine :
Mark 1 : 105.003-63, I need to check the serial but it's around 22 million
Mark 2 : 105.003-65, serial 24.013.xxx
Mark 1 : 105.003-65, serial 24.536.xxx
- Posts
- 187
- Likes
- 200
gminnj
·Really great thread. Here's my 105.003-65, with a serial 24.002.xxx.
According to what I'm seeing above, looks like a Mark 1?
According to what I'm seeing above, looks like a Mark 1?
- Posts
- 32
- Likes
- 36
- Posts
- 576
- Likes
- 858
Georgieboy58
·Obviously no correlation of serial number range and type of dial.
With the few examples we have here we already have:
Mk 1: 22.xxx - 24.536
Mk 2: 22.6xx - 25.499
2 suppliers?
2 cliches used in parallel?
With the few examples we have here we already have:
Mk 1: 22.xxx - 24.536
Mk 2: 22.6xx - 25.499
2 suppliers?
2 cliches used in parallel?
