For the dial itself, hard to tell without better pic but at least we can confirm
- the crosshair is correct (it continues behind the letters)
- MOY check seems good, as the "el" and the star
- "Chronometre" instead of "Chronometer" is normal given its age ("Chronometer" could even be incorrect for that model, but I am not sure at all, others will be able to confirm/deny that point)
- not 100% sure but it seems intermediate hour indices are dots, while the 4 major are rectangulars. Also good.
For me it looks like a good start as far as we are only talking about dial authenticity.
Now for the complete watch... it could be only the angle but on the last pic the second hand seems a bit short.
Also - and I hope someone will also be able to confirm/deny that point with 100% certainty - I think that the dial, hands and case material is always supposed to match (gold with gold, steel with steel)
Here a good example of what it should look like:
(edit: the example of BenBagbag is also a very good example
😀)

(pic source:
http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t=tree&goto=2894774&rid=0