- Posts
- 4,402
- Likes
- 5,799
JohnSteed
·Anyone care to say (or guess) why the dial seems so unevenly patinated?
Constellation 2852-7sc -rather rare?
- Posts
- 1,030
- Likes
- 2,614
Banner Roar
·From case images looks like maybe something up at the 6 o'clock position. Might be seal issue.
- Posts
- 930
- Likes
- 3,728
Giff2577
·I would hazard a guess that the crystal failed at the bottom around 6 o'clock letting in moisture in.
- Posts
- 2,444
- Likes
- 9,904
Rman
·Reveal:
I took a gamble that this dial just had some flaking lacquer from moisture intrusion and that the underlying paint was unharmed...
The lacquer was completely removed and then the dial re-sprayed. It's on a 1035 and has a new lease on life.
In my opinion this is one of the great Connie references of all time so it justifies the time and money spent.
I took a gamble that this dial just had some flaking lacquer from moisture intrusion and that the underlying paint was unharmed...
The lacquer was completely removed and then the dial re-sprayed. It's on a 1035 and has a new lease on life.
In my opinion this is one of the great Connie references of all time so it justifies the time and money spent.
- Posts
- 8,711
- Likes
- 14,616
efauser
·Reveal:
I took a gamble that this dial just had some flaking lacquer from moisture intrusion and that the underlying paint was unharmed...
The lacquer was completely removed and then the dial re-sprayed. It's on a 1035 and has a new lease on life.
In my opinion this is one of the great Connie references of all time so it justifies the time and money spent.
- Posts
- 3,780
- Likes
- 20,197
ahsposo
··Most fun screen name at ΩFDibs!
- Posts
- 1,188
- Likes
- 3,513
Pahawi
·Second dibs, please 😀
- Posts
- 8,711
- Likes
- 14,616
efauser
·In my country, saying something is spectacular is the same as calling dibs.
- Posts
- 739
- Likes
- 1,300
Mods
·@Rman that's impressive. The before pics looks like the original black paint had faded. Very impressive that all of the clear laquer was removed and replaced giving the glossy finish.
Do you mind sharing who did this work for you and some details of the process and your decision making process!
Dial wasn't that's bad before work was done and would be interested to hear how you decided risking removing all the dial printing with the laquer.
Great topic post, thanks
Do you mind sharing who did this work for you and some details of the process and your decision making process!
Dial wasn't that's bad before work was done and would be interested to hear how you decided risking removing all the dial printing with the laquer.
Great topic post, thanks
- Posts
- 4,402
- Likes
- 5,799
JohnSteed
·Reveal:
I took a gamble that this dial just had some flaking lacquer from moisture intrusion and that the underlying paint was unharmed...
The lacquer was completely removed and then the dial re-sprayed. It's on a 1035 and has a new lease on life.
In my opinion this is one of the great Connie references of all time so it justifies the time and money spent.
👍 .... dibs
- Posts
- 921
- Likes
- 734
mikechi22
·Reveal:
I took a gamble that this dial just had some flaking lacquer from moisture intrusion and that the underlying paint was unharmed...
The lacquer was completely removed and then the dial re-sprayed. It's on a 1035 and has a new lease on life.
In my opinion this is one of the great Connie references of all time so it justifies the time and money spent.
- Posts
- 2,444
- Likes
- 9,904
Rman
·@Rman that's impressive. The before pics looks like the original black paint had faded. Very impressive that all of the clear laquer was removed and replaced giving the glossy finish.
Do you mind sharing who did this work for you and some details of the process and your decision making process!
Dial wasn't that's bad before work was done and would be interested to hear how you decided risking removing all the dial printing with the laquer.
Great topic post, thanks
I first heard of the process of re-lacquering on Desmond's blog although "S.D." did not work on my example.
"S.D." is probably living in Shangri-La somewhere in the Himalayas for all I know, although I did try to find him a couple years ago...
I'm abbreviating his name so that those who search for him don't come to this thread.
It was a dilemma whether to show the "after" pictures because I'm not at liberty to disclose who did the work.
He is a master watchmaker who restores for auction houses and some dealers, and is probably known to other collectors here.
He starts by putting the dial under a microscope and determines whether the watch is a good candidate to be re-lacquered because of how the inking was done. My understanding is that some dials are lacquered and then inked and then sometimes re-lacquered which makes restoration impossible. The inking has to be the first layer of the dial after the paint.
He then showed me examples of stuff he is working on, and if I was allowed to photograph and display the watches he had in his "inbox" to you in this thread you would know why I trusted him to mess with the dial. You would also be salivating and jumping around like a rabid baboon like I was.
All I can tell you is he has a proprietary process for removing the lacquer(not known to me either), and starts with an extremely small spot on the edge of the dial to see how the dial reacts before proceeding. He then actually matches the lacquer by mimicking the original matte or degree of glossiness of the lacquer in his new lacquer mix.
Other watchmakers have this knowledge as well so he is no wizard, but he is freaking talented.
- Posts
- 2,444
- Likes
- 9,904
Similar threads
- Posts
- 6
- Views
- 435
- Posts
- 2
- Views
- 1K
- Posts
- 26
- Views
- 3K