Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Crown is wrong. But nice watch.
Crown is wrong. But nice watch.
My first thought as well, but apparently these later 168.010 Constellations with straight lugs had this crown as well..
A nice watch indeed.
The case isn’t ultra sharp but I’ll bet it looks good on the wrist.
Good looking dial.
I don’t think 67 is especially late but a 14k case is uncommon.
The crown is similar to one of the options for a replacement crown but I’d be interested to see/hear any information you have found that shows they were supplied on these references from new.
I was told by the person I bought it from, whom i typically hold in good regard. He shared this url..
https://www.omegawatches.com/watch-omega-constellation-omega-cd-168-0010
But happy to be challenged that this is not enough evidence..
thank you for the response.
The picture of the watch shows the correct ‘hidden crown’ but the OVDB entry is also a bit misleading.
168.010 reference was a replacement for the 168.004, which was released in 62, (although it also had a little-known predecessor, the 14918, possibly issued a year or two earlier)
The 168.010 was released in 66, initially with a cal 561 but soon changing to the new 564 movt.
likewise, it originally had dauphine hands, later changing to pencil hands.
There are two styles of replacement crown for the 168.010 - both expressed crowns and one of them rounded.
Perhaps because of this it has been suggested that 168.010 was delivered with an expressed crown but I don’t think anyone has shown that this was actually the case.
This shouldnt stop you enjoying the watch should you buy it - whilst looking good the hidden crowns are a PITA to use.
I did end up buying it - but really, happy to receive all this feedback. Just so I understand
- the photo shown in the OVDB entry is of an older model, therefore cannot be used as an info for this model
- given that this was the 'typical' replacement crown, it might well be a replacement
- we haven't been able to prove that the 168.010 was delivered with a crown like this
Have we come across 168.010 models with a different 'original' crown? I've done a bit of a search, but have consistently come across the one that's on mine.
Also, given that the model is quite unusual (14k, 25 mill serial with a pie pan), could that be an explanation?
Thanks! What is the difference between English cased and Swiss cased? Does English cased means that it was intended for US/AUS/NZ? (that was likely the intention of this model)
Thanks! What is the difference between English cased and Swiss cased? Does English cased means that it was intended for US/AUS/NZ? (that was likely the intention of this model)