thank you for the response.
The picture of the watch shows the correct ‘hidden crown’ but the OVDB entry is also a bit misleading.
168.010 reference was a replacement for the 168.004, which was released in 62, (although it also had a little-known predecessor, the 14918, possibly issued a year or two earlier)
The 168.010 was released in 66, initially with a cal 561 but soon changing to the new 564 movt.
likewise, it originally had dauphine hands, later changing to pencil hands.
There are two styles of replacement crown for the 168.010 - both expressed crowns and one of them rounded.
Perhaps because of this it has been suggested that 168.010 was delivered with an expressed crown but I don’t think anyone has shown that this was actually the case.
This shouldnt stop you enjoying the watch should you buy it - whilst looking good the hidden crowns are a PITA to use.
Click to expand...