Omega Constellation 168.010: Redial or Original Dial?

T

Posts

12

Likes

5

time-after-time

·Nov 18, 2025

Hello,

I found this Constellation for sale at a good price. Was considering buying it but I am not sure about the dial. Is it original or a redial? The seller says the dial is original but if you look at the "Constellation" font and compare it with other Constellation dials from the same era, it's very different. What do you think? Your help is appreciated.

 

Posts

2,267

Likes

3,094

Passover

·Nov 18, 2025

Redial, "Chronometre" instead of "Chronometer", font is very thin and wrong

The lugs also don't look attractiv as far as I can see

 

Posts

217

Likes

352

stormysky10

·Nov 18, 2025

+1 for redial

 

Posts

895

Likes

2,848

Porteroso

·Nov 18, 2025

Definitel redial.

 

Posts

92

Likes

106

myouss

·Nov 20, 2025

Passover

Redial, "Chronometre" instead of "Chronometer", font is very thin and wrong

The lugs also don't look attractiv as far as I can see

The spelling of chronometer is not an indicator afaik, there are definitely Omega dials with the spelling 'chronometre'.

But this one is absolutely a redial.

 

Posts

6,610

Likes

10,195

Peemacgee

·Nov 20, 2025·Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers

myouss

The spelling of chronometer is not an indicator afaik, there are definitely Omega dials with the spelling 'chronometre'.

But this one is absolutely a redial.

It’s the spelling of chronometer relative to the particular Constellation reference that @Passover was referring to.

A ‘hidden crown’ Constellation should never have the ‘re’ spelling.
1950s Constellations (with late 50s exceptions) will have the ‘re’ spelling.

 

T

Posts

12

Likes

5

time-after-time

·Nov 21, 2025

Thanks everyone, I appreciate your input. Glad I didn't buy this one.

 

Posts

881

Likes

1,692

TIMElyBehaviour

·Nov 21, 2025

I also believe it’s a redial but for me the telling sign is the writing under omega is not just thin but also more pronounced in areas. This unevenness almost always tells you it’s a reprint.