JwRosenthal
·I agree that we all have to start somewhere, but you can usually tell from someone’s collection what kind of interest they have in horology versus just jewelry...and this is costume jewelry.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
a watch is a piece of jewelry, not a time-providing device any more.
It's unfair to be so cynical - a watch is a piece of jewelry, not a time-providing device any more. One buys what one likes, and can afford, and what makes one feel good. Some folks get their kicks out of modern art, or classic art, which both have about the same functional quality as a watch - ie zero... If your friend likes Lacoste and fashion watches, and he's happy with what's in his watch box, then more power to him 👍 To each is own....
MICHAEL KORS
My buddy’s wife (who wears a fit-bit or looks at her phone to tell time) wanted to get a nice watch after sitting in on all the Saturday night watch talk we would have at his house. She sent him the link to a Michael Kors watch she liked online. I expressed outrage “are you really gonna buy her that POS?!?!”😲
His response was that if it made her happy and got her interested in the hobby, he didn’t care what it was.
She wore it and loved it. The following Xmas he got her a 70’s Tudor Princess date on jubilee...the Micheal Kors hasn’t been worn since.
We all gotta start somewhere.
I am sure that I am not the only one for whom a watch still serves as a functional timepiece. I never owned a wrist watch as an adult until I needed one for my job. I do agree with the rest of what you originally posted.
100% Agree. I've worn or carried a watch of some sort pretty much every single day since I was a kid. I was definitely born in the wrong decade, but w/o a proper watch, be it wrist or pocket, I genuinely get anxious. For me, a phone/computer/wall clock/position of the sun just doesn't work. Of course, maybe I'm just crazy....