Caught a Speedy 105.003 63

Posts
1,110
Likes
3,389
Can anyone please enligthen me on the Speedy 105.002 62? Is it much rarer and more valuable than the 105.003 63? The same person who sold me the 105.003 is now offering the 105.002 with alpha hands and serial number in the 19.5m range. As i understand, it uses the also smaller 2998 case and smaller pushers?
 
Posts
5,861
Likes
16,791
Can anyone please enligthen me on the Speedy 105.002 62? Is it much rarer and more valuable than the 105.003 63? The same person who sold me the 105.003 is now offering the 105.002 with alpha hands and serial number in the 19.5m range. As i understand, it uses the also smaller 2998 case and smaller pushers?

105.002-62 (with alpha hands) is basically identical to the 2998-62 but has the new reference system (105.0xx) instituted by Omega. The specs sound correct but pics are needed regarding dial, hands, etc.
 
Posts
1,762
Likes
7,219
The silver rehaut of the crystal is also nice...and correct! Last reference where we can see that.
 
Posts
1,110
Likes
3,389
105.002-62 (with alpha hands) is basically identical to the 2998-62 but has the new reference system (105.0xx) instituted by Omega. The specs sound correct but pics are needed regarding dial, hands, etc.


Here is a picture of the watch

 
Posts
1,565
Likes
3,672
Here is a picture of the watch


If you don't take it, please feel free to forward me the deal 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
 
Posts
316
Likes
1,683
Congrats on an amazing find. Loving the patina on the lume here. Very striking and not so common.
 
Posts
441
Likes
1,383
Very nice watches (both!). It seems you have the right source! Congratulations 😀

e: what’s up with the bezel? I’ve never seen such cutoff numbers before?! 😕
Edited:
 
Posts
603
Likes
549
Both very nice looking watches, especially the 105.003-63 🥰
 
Posts
1,320
Likes
10,695
That 002 looks good. Might have some mis matched pushers and potentially relumed hands. But looks nice.