Canuck
·I commented mostly because these hands are not the typical spade style, they really dress up these watches, they are original, and I’m a bit of a pedant. 😀
The skinny on @Fritz ’s stunning Elgin Father Time. Total production just over 10,000. How the world of watches has changed. Today, a total production of 20,000 of any model of watch would be touted as a “limited edition”. I have a strong suspicion that this splendid artifact has diamond endstones on the balance staff pivots.
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/14409625
Diamond endstones, I thought so! I have a 19-jewel version of that movement, a B W Raymond. Mine is from the first run of that particular grade. Bought in Spokane (likely) in 1903.
How did you narrow it down to Spokane? The only thing I know about mine is that it came from the states.
Mine is a family watch. It came from my wife’s great grandfather. He was a sergeant in the Union Army. He then went on to become a sheriff in Paducah County, in Kentucky. Then he and his wife and small children moved to farm in Kansas. After a time there, his wife became afraid of tornados and what might happen to the children. They moved to a farm at Spangle, Washington, south of Spokane. He founded a hardware business in Spangle early in the 20th century. Spangle was a small town in 1901, but between the farm and the hardware business, he prospered. I can really only assume the watch was bought in the nearest city, Spokane, because it is unlikely anyone in Spangle would have sold such an expensive item.
WOW! Thats a really NICE watch.
and with family history attached to boot, that must have a place of honour in the collection.
i love those fancy dials, I picked up a mint one a year or so back and fitted it to a plain 15j Elgin movement I fitted into a nice coin silver case, they sure do make for a nice piece! any idea how much they would ad to the price, information on such dials is a bit thin on the ground.
diamond endstones? indeed it does.
until just a few weeks ago an 18s 3/4 plate Elgin railroad watch was on my very short list of things to acquire to complete the collection and it was reasonably priced to boot!
the detail I find amusing is the threaded curved rod that the regulator uses, I'd love to know how they made that.
............................
the detail I find amusing is the threaded curved rod that the regulator uses, I'd love to know how they made that.
Note that the carrier nut turns on the curved bolt (& takes the end of the regulator arm along with it), but that the curved bolt itself is fixed in place.
I have seen this implementation referred to as a "Moseley Regulator".
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/reference/patent/157021
For the adjustment nut to move freely along the threaded rod the rod would have needed to have had the threads cut after it was bent. Otherwise the threads on the inside of the bend would be closer together and the threads on the outside of the bend further apart which would have caused binding as the nut traveled along it.
One might wonder how a die could be used to cut the thread because of the “bolster” at each end as indicated by the arrows! I wonder if, instead of a die, a “rolling” process as shown in the second photo might have been used.
For the adjustment nut to move freely along the threaded rod the rod would have needed to have had the threads cut after it was bent. Otherwise the threads on the inside of the bend would be closer together and the threads on the outside of the bend further apart which would have caused binding as the nut traveled along it.
A typical threading die for small scale work like the threaded rod would typically only comprise two or three threads. That’s the way my tiny dies are. If a die could somehow have been used to thread the curved rod, the arc circumscribed by the rod while the die was working its way along the rod would be minimal. If a die comprised 10 or 12 threads in a cylindrical aspect, the threading the curved rod would not have worked well.
Straight rod and then bend.
I think it would be possible.
A small button die around 0.61mm (0.024") to cut the thread, then bend the curve and cut the flats.
The nut would be tapped slightly oversize and possibly relieved slightly at each end. The width of the nut would also have to be kept to a minimum to prevent binding. There is negligible force in this application so I don't expect that extremely high tolerances would have been considered.
Traveling along the curve, the nut would be supported by threads at either end of the nut (inside the curve) and threads in the centre of the nut (outside the curve).
It's also possible that the rod could have been roller threaded as suggested by @Canuck. This however, would come under the "straight rod and bend" theory.
Curved rod to start with.
I think you may be onto something there. A small button die with few threads would be able to follow the curve of the rod.
The nut though, would still have to have the same oversizing/relieving to be able to travel the curve without binding.
I measured the curved rod/screw thingy and it's 0.61mm diameter, so not really minute in watch terms.
The rotating nut is only 1mm wide and under the microscope the threads at either end look slightly shallower, but it's difficult to see how much in comparison the the centre area threads.
One might wonder how a die could be used to cut the thread because of the “bolster” at each end as indicated by the arrows! I wonder if, instead of a die, a “rolling” process as shown in the second photo might have been used.
If the “nut” that follows the curved rod was threaded all the way through in a cylindrical aspect, there might be difficulty with it following the curved rod. But suppose for a moment that the cylindrical “nut” had only say two or three threads at each end of the bore, and was not threaded all the way through! What intrigues me more than this though, is how did the “nut” get onto the curved thread with a larger diameter bolster at each end of the threaded rod?