Calling all Pocket Watch Buffs

Posts
3,817
Likes
16,137
This watch is marked 23-jewels. Legislation was enacted decades ago, during the era of the 100-jewel watch (75 of which did nothing, and were fitted only to avoid fraud). This watch would not meet modern standards regarding “functional” jewels. Cap jewels on most watches act as thrust bearings, and where they are used, the pivots beneath them are conical, so the tip of the pivot contacts the cap jewel. On this Porte & Markle, there are 4 cap jewels (three of them circled) that are only there for decoration. Beneath them are standard plate hole jewels, and square shoulder pivots. In fact, this watch has only 19 actual functional jewels when the modern definition of a cap jewel is used. These cap jewels appear to be held by screws, but the cap jewels are not removable! Never saw anything like this before.

Dust covers?

Hub caps!
 
Posts
14,321
Likes
41,272
On almost all higher jewel count watches with cap jewels and conical pivots, the correct oiling procedure results in a “bead” of oil on the under side of the cap jewel. The cap jewel is not there as a “dust cover”, or hub cap. It’s main purpose is to aid in the reduction of friction, and as a retainer for lubricant by helping stop it from spreading away from where it is needed. This image is from the Bulova Watch Co. watch repair training manual. The red represents the “bead” of oil mentioned above. Capillary attraction keeps the oil centered over pivot hole in the hole jewel assuring the oil is retained at the pivot where it is needed. Here, the tip of the conical pivot that would run in the hole jewel, uses the cap jewel as a thrust bearing.





The subject watch is not jewelled in the manner above. The cap jewels serve no function other than eye appeal. The pivot beneath the cap jewels in the subject watch have square shoulders, and run in a standard plate jewel, and neither the oil or the pivot contact the cap jewel. A peculiar arrangement. The watch is marked “23-jewels”, but actually only 19 of the jewels are functional. Legislation enacted in the 1950s to counter the practice of fitting jewels that don’t do anything, would mean that the subject watch is not marked legally. But it is still a nice watch.
 
Posts
3,817
Likes
16,137
On almost all higher jewel count watches with cap jewels and conical pivots, the correct oiling procedure results in a “bead” of oil on the under side of the cap jewel. The cap jewel is not there as a “dust cover”, or hub cap. It’s main purpose is to aid in the reduction of friction, and as a retainer for lubricant by helping stop it from spreading away from where it is needed. This image is from the Bulova Watch Co. watch repair training manual. The red represents the “bead” of oil mentioned above. Capillary attraction keeps the oil centered over pivot hole in the hole jewel assuring the oil is retained at the pivot where it is needed. Here, the tip of the conical pivot that would run in the hole jewel, uses the cap jewel as a thrust bearing.





The subject watch is not jewelled in the manner above. The cap jewels serve no function other than eye appeal. The pivot beneath the cap jewels in the subject watch have square shoulders, and run in a standard plate jewel, and neither the oil or the pivot contact the cap jewel. A peculiar arrangement. The watch is marked “23-jewels”, but actually only 19 of the jewels are functional. Legislation enacted in the 1950s to counter the practice of fitting jewels that don’t do anything, would mean that the subject watch is not marked legally. But it is still a nice watch.


It claims to be adjusted to five positions and has a micrometric regulator, I wonder if, given the fake cap jewels, this was actually adjusted to that many positions and was it sold as a railway quality watch. One wonders what the thinking was behind this piece, after all, this isn’t many years after the swiss fake era.

as you said, damn pretty piece.
 
Posts
14,321
Likes
41,272
It claims to be adjusted to five positions and has a micrometric regulator, I wonder if, given the fake cap jewels, this was actually adjusted to that many positions and was it sold as a railway quality watch. One wonders what the thinking was behind this piece, after all, this isn’t many years after the swiss fake era.

as you said, damn pretty piece.

With a Canadian private label name, and given that the maker cannot be identified, it could not have been railroad approved in Canada. Porte & Markle Ltd. were likely railroad watch inspectors, so I very much doubt they would have touted it as railroad standard. My thinking is that it may have been used by them as a “loaner” watch for use by a railroader whose watch was in for repair. The watch has had very little use in it’s approximately 110 years of existence. The fit and finish of the watch and every part of it tells me it likely was adjusted to a high standard. I doubt any maker would pay so much attention to microscopic detail if they intended to stretch the truth by marking it fraudulently.

I have uploaded two pictures of a genuine fake railroad watch. The watch was produced by the Trenton Watch Co., Trenton N J., using a standard run, cheap Trenton movement. This one is marked 23-jewels! You can see six fake cap jewels on the top bridge. These are made of red celluloid. So, 23 minus 6 equals 17. Beneath these fake cap jewels there are plain un-jewelled brass bearings. The movement has only 7 jewels! A slight exaggeration of only 10 jewels! It is marked “ADJUSTED”. (Snicker). Not a hope. The movement and dial are marked “LOCOMOTIVE SPECIAL”. Yeah, right! The dial has a locomotive on it. It is lever set. The watch was produced for an outfit in Chicago, and its type was aimed at people who believed in a free lunch. That you could buy a genuine railroad watch for under $10.00, when a genuine one would be 3 or 4 times the price. It had all the visual cues to convince the unwary. So my Porte & Markle is not typical of a fake railroad watch.

The Trenton Watch Co. was sold to Ingersoll circa 1908. Ingersoll in turn was sold to U S Time circa 1922! U S Time became TIMEX! So this one’s cheap watch DNA is clearly evident!


Edited:
 
Posts
3,817
Likes
16,137
With a Canadian private label name, and given that the maker cannot be identified, it could not have been railroad approved in Canada. Porte & Markle Ltd. were likely railroad watch inspectors, so I very much doubt they would have touted it as railroad standard. My thinking is that it may have been used by them as a “loaner” watch for use by a railroader whose watch was in for repair. The watch has had very little use in it’s approximately 110 years of existence. The fit and finish of the watch and every part of it tells me it likely was adjusted to a high standard. I doubt any maker would pay so much attention to microscopic detail if they intended to stretch the truth by marking it

I have uploaded two pictures of a genuine fake railroad watch. The watch was produced by the Trenton Watch Co., Trenton N J., using a standard run, cheap Trenton movement. This one is marked 23-jewels! You can see six fake cap jewels on the top bridge. These are made of red celluloid. So, 23 minus 6 equals 17. Beneath these fake cap jewels there are plain un-jewelled brass bearings. The movement has only 7 jewels! A slight exaggeration of only 10 jewels! It is marked “ADJUSTED”. (Snicker). Not a hope. The movement and dial are marked “LOCOMOTIVE SPECIAL”. Yeah, right! The dial has a locomotive on it. It is lever set. The watch was produced for an outfit in Chicago, and its type was aimed at people who believed in a free lunch. That you could buy a genuine railroad watch for under $10.00, when a genuine one would be 3 or 4 times the price. It had all the visual cues to convince the unwary. So my Porte & Markle is not typical of a fake railroad watch.

The Trenton Watch Co. was sold to Ingersoll circa 1908. Ingersoll in turn was sold to U S Time circa 1922! U S Time became TIMEX! So this one’s cheap watch DNA is clearly evident!



ouch!,,, thats a nasty little turd!
 
Posts
14,321
Likes
41,272
ouch!,,, thats a nasty little turd!

I have only the one shown in this post, plus another movement only, for parts. There are enough of these round that the watch shows in the Shugart, Engel, & Gilbert “bible”. There are people who collect these, surprisingly! I keep it around since it does represent one phase of watch evolution.
 
Posts
7,933
Likes
57,324
I'll re-post this here as a reminder that Ingersoll-Trenton made at least one nice watch.

RR grade and approved on a spur or two........IN THE US😁

15 or so are documented




Advertised as......."21j performance at 15j pricing!"
 
Posts
3,817
Likes
16,137
I'll re-post this here as a reminder that Ingersoll-Trenton made at least one nice watch.

RR grade and approved on a spur or two........IN THE US😁

15 or so are documented




Advertised as......."21j performance at 15j pricing!"

i’ve always loved the look of “3 finger” movements.
 
Posts
14,321
Likes
41,272
Serial number 3419771 of the Trenton railroad standard watch posted by @TexOmega shows in the Shugart, Engel, & Gilbert “bible”. The pocketwatchdatabase site doesn’t list this railroad standard model, but the watch is marked just as you would expect a railroad standard watch to be marked. The pocketwatchdatabase site indicates this very model may also have been produced in lesser grades that were not railroad standard. The subject watch doesn’t have the marking for double roller. But that may be because the watch might have been made before that marking became essential.


The Shugart book lists this as probably having been made prior to 1900.
 
Posts
3,817
Likes
16,137
Mmmmmm.... 3 finger movements.... Elgin 156



these movements cataloged at $100 wholesale in 1905, uncased.
 
Posts
7,933
Likes
57,324
Serial number 3419771 of the Trenton railroad standard watch posted by @TexOmega shows in the Shugart, Engel, & Gilbert “bible”. The pocketwatchdatabase site doesn’t list this railroad standard model, but the watch is marked just as you would expect a railroad standard watch to be marked. The pocketwatchdatabase site indicates this very model may also have been produced in lesser grades that were not railroad standard. The subject watch doesn’t have the marking for double roller. But that may be because the watch might have been made before that marking became essential.


The Shugart book lists this as probably having been made prior to 1900.


1908 because that year Ingersoll bought Trenton.....and double signed as such
 
Posts
14,321
Likes
41,272
Mmmmmm.... 3 finger movements.... Elgin 156



these movements cataloged at $100 wholesale in 1905, uncased.

The Elgin book by Roy Ehrhardt lists this watch as grade 156, one of a total production of 4,000. Kinda makes us wonder about the modern definition of limited edition. Beautiful watch. Any chance you can show us more pictures of (for example) the case and dial?
 
Posts
3,817
Likes
16,137
The Elgin book by Roy Ehrhardt lists this watch as grade 156, one of a total production of 4,000. Kinda makes us wonder about the modern definition of limited edition. Beautiful watch. Any chance you can show us more pictures of (for example) the case and dial?
Sure!

My 1904 grade 156 Elgin in solid 14k gold case, originally sold by C.D.Peacock of Chicago, who are still around and I believe claim to be Chicago's oldest retailer having been around since the 1830s.



doesn't look like its seen much use, so I assume it was somebody's pride and joy reserved for special occasions, not surprising since it likely cost them about $250 new in about 1904.
 
Posts
14,321
Likes
41,272
Sure!

My 1904 grade 156 Elgin in solid 14k gold case, originally sold by C.D.Peacock of Chicago, who are still around and I believe claim to be Chicago's oldest retailer having been around since the 1830s.



doesn't look like its seen much use, so I assume it was somebody's pride and joy reserved for special occasions, not surprising since it likely cost them about $250 new in about 1904.

Absolutely stunning! Thanks for the additional pictures. IIRC, you may have told us about this one in an earlier post. Always nice to revisit such a work of art!
 
Posts
3,817
Likes
16,137
There are two items on my "watch" bucket list, those things that would tick the few remaining boxes of items I'd like for my little collection.

1) a 950 series Hamilton, not the 950B, but the earlier bridge model with the sexy screw down jewel settings - relatively rare in Canada and expensive I'll likely not land one of these.

and
2) an 18s Elgin with a 3/4 plate movement - incoming!

ordered this little bugger yesterday: 1909ish Elgin 18s 3/4 plate "Father Time" lever set railroad grade watch

 
Posts
14,321
Likes
41,272
You’re looking for a Hamilton 950. One of these. I have one. Or a 950E. One of those I don’t have.

My 950 has gold train wheels. My 2014 copy of the Shugart book lists these at 1900 to 2400 U S for a mint one. 1200 to1400 for fine one. There are 2 currently on eBay listed as 950s at 1200 to 1400, U S. Mine would not rank as mint because of the garish hand-engraved pattern on the case back. It is otherwise very very good. If you want to talk, PM me.

Hamilton 950.

 
Posts
3,463
Likes
9,391
You’re looking for a Hamilton 950. One of these. I have one. Or a 950E. One of those I don’t have.

My 950 has gold train wheels. My 2014 copy of the Shugart book lists these at 1900 to 2400 U S for a mint one. 1200 to1400 for fine one. There are 2 currently on eBay listed as 950s at 1200 to 1400, U S. Mine would not rank as mint because of the garish hand-engraved pattern on the case back. It is otherwise very very good. If you want to talk, PM me.

Hamilton 950.


I think we all want to see the garish hand engraved back.
 
Posts
5,957
Likes
43,497
We'd better be careful of what we ask for. We won't be able to unsee it.
 
Posts
14,321
Likes
41,272
I think we all want to see the garish hand engraved back.

We'd better be careful of what we ask for. We won't be able to unsee it.

Your wish is my command. I took three pictures of the 950 which might be a bit better than the ones I showed earlier. To the best of my knowledge, this case is original to that movement. There are no extra marks from the case screws of previous tenants. This case back shows brass around the perimeter, and the engraving shows a great deal of wear.
The double sunk vitreous enamel dial is perfect. The movement is in excellent order, and it has gold train wheels. A railroad watch typically would not have an engraved case back. These watches were service items, and while we appreciate them in a different light today, they were a tool in the cab of a steam locomotive of 100 years ago. These watches worked hard, in an awful environment. Worn in the bib overalls of an engineer, the pocket full of clinkers. An engraved case back compromised the life expectancy of the case of a railroad watch. I don’t think this one was worn by a railroader, based on the repair marks inside the case back.

 
Posts
5,957
Likes
43,497
That's not such a badly engraved back. Appears to have carry wear.