Forums Latest Members
  1. Kek25 Sep 6, 2019

    Posts
    159
    Likes
    116
    6830C595-996B-40AF-AC34-09792FA85DA5.jpeg 9D3E5A4D-6387-4C72-865F-C2A0F24EC101.jpeg 32C01343-4C4D-4B44-8BDB-C62BF78E4F23.jpeg 023AA386-7F95-4329-A1F8-231D6CEC7073.jpeg 406A51B5-15B1-4BF2-A818-3BD23862BA3E.jpeg 327A4128-3152-4AE6-BC98-55C8FEA93ADB.jpeg 6437E50A-50FE-44A0-B92E-9896DDA52121.jpeg

    Looking to purchase another 504 and came across this example. To my not-yet-eagle eye, the dial appears to have an even patina without damage, the ss case appears to have been polished, and the seller doesn’t provide a photo of the observatory and stars. Description is somewhat over embellished in my opinion as “in great condition” and “very rare and difficult to find.” I have no experience with straps and bracelets so don’t have a knowledgeable comment on this example. Would I be correct in identifying this as a beads of rice bracelet?

    The reference 2943 appears correct housing this 504 movement dating the watch to 2 years before my 1959 birth year. The movement is not as nice as my redialed example and appears to show some signs of rotor rub which may also be residue that requires cleaning.

    I’m not quite certain on how to evaluate the crown. I’ve looked at the numbering of Omega winding crowns chart in Desmond’s blog site but can’t figure out how to use it as a reference in determining originality of the crown.

    What can the experts add to the critique of this watch, please.

    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. seekingseaquest Sep 6, 2019

    Posts
    2,338
    Likes
    6,177
  3. Kek25 Sep 6, 2019

    Posts
    159
    Likes
    116
    Edited Sep 6, 2019