Cal 8900, is it same movement than latest cal 8500..

Posts
18
Likes
19
what about the 8601/8611 movements? they are based on the 8500 but which version?
 
Posts
23
Likes
26
Hi all. I recently bought a 2018 PO 8500 45.5
Ref 232.30.46.21.01.003
As it has the Si14 does that make it 15000 gauss antimagnetic?
If not, does anybody know how antimagnetic it is?
Just thinking about iPad cases etc.
Thanks in advance
Nick
 
Posts
29,672
Likes
76,830
Hi all. I recently bought a 2018 PO 8500 45.5
Ref 232.30.46.21.01.003
As it has the Si14 does that make it 15000 gauss antimagnetic?
If not, does anybody know how antimagnetic it is?
Just thinking about iPad cases etc.
Thanks in advance
Nick

This should have an 8500B inside, so not the full 15,000 gauss rating. Having said that it will be far more antimagnetic than watches with typical alloy balance springs.

Cheers, Al
Edited:
 
Posts
99
Likes
175
here is a nice summary (note the 1 error. the 8500 wasn't an upgrade of the 2500, it was a totally new movement):
https://wristviews.com/2018/06/diff...00a-8500b-8500g-8800-8900-co-axial-movements/

Note that Omega will not upgrade a 8500a to 8500b to 8500g to 8900 as they all have component changes which, although non-material, are significant enough to require assembly and design from scratch (e.g. they will not upgrade a 8500a to a silicon spring if faulty or during a service, they will only reinstall a new or refurbished version of the original component)

I found a blog once which detailed the exact component changes between each version, but can't seem to find it.
Will post when I find it.
 
Posts
23
Likes
26
This should have an 7500B inside, so not the full 15,000 gauss rating. Having said that it will be far more antimagnetic than watches with typical alloy balance springs.

Cheers, Al
Thanks Al. It seems to lose up to 4s/d so as it’s not speeding up I guess it’s ok.
 
Posts
23
Likes
26
here is a nice summary (note the 1 error. the 8500 wasn't an upgrade of the 2500, it was a totally new movement):
https://wristviews.com/2018/06/diff...00a-8500b-8500g-8800-8900-co-axial-movements/

Note that Omega will not upgrade a 8500a to 8500b to 8500g to 8900 as they all have component changes which, although non-material, are significant enough to require assembly and design from scratch (e.g. they will not upgrade a 8500a to a silicon spring if faulty or during a service, they will only reinstall a new or refurbished version of the original component)

I found a blog once which detailed the exact component changes between each version, but can't seem to find it.
Will post when I find it.
Thanks, I’ll read through it.
 
Posts
62
Likes
115
I have model: 231.10.42.21.01.006
It says "Master Co-Axial Chronometer" on the front and "15000 Gauss Anti Magnetic" on the back. Which 8500 is it? The product sheet does not specify.
 
Posts
986
Likes
3,009
I have model: 231.10.42.21.01.006
It says "Master Co-Axial Chronometer" on the front and "15000 Gauss Anti Magnetic" on the back. Which 8500 is it? The product sheet does not specify.

8500g

 
Posts
986
Likes
3,009
So, is the 8500g considered an "In-house movement?"

IMO it does.
One can disagree and tell e.g. something like "Omega 8*** calibres are not inhouse, cause it was ETA who designed them for Omega" but usually those are the people who are really hardcore members. For sure there are threads to discuss this topic, but I never bothered to read them.
 
Posts
3
Likes
1
you guys just need to know that these 8*** movement are exclusively for Omega watches and it is a reliable movement. Accuracy is really top notch (owner of 2 AT and one globemaster) when balance wheel is fine tuned.
 
Posts
529
Likes
1,383
I thought the Globemaster had the 8900 or 8901 movements, not 8500?

Indedd, Globemaster is 8900, actually first Omega Master Chronometer released for sales.