Cal 561 vs 564 desirability in a 168.005

Posts

2,640

Likes

3,093

kaplan

·Jul 15, 2023

hoipolloi

564= cannon pinion saver.

I was actually thinking of starting a thread recently to gather opinions on upgrading a 561 watch with the quickset mechanism, easy to find 565 donors

 

Posts

3,742

Likes

6,360

hoipolloi

·Jul 15, 2023

Archer

Bergeon will make a tool for just about anything, even turning a simple job into a complex one needing a special tool like this...🙄

You mean you use this?

 

Posts

780

Likes

2,449

tamura

·Jul 15, 2023

Are there 168.005/564 Connys with onyx inlays? That would be important to me.

 

Posts

6,307

Likes

9,750

Peemacgee

·Jul 16, 2023·Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers

tamura

Are there 168.005/564 Connys with onyx inlays? That would be important to me.

Almost certainly (I don't have one to show you so I can't say absolutely - although I'm sure someone will have one)

the 564 was released as early as 65 but lets say it was used in production watches from 66.
There is quite an overlap of the use of 561s and 564s.
Although the exact cut off time for onyx in a 168.005 is somewhat contentious, it was no earlier than say 67 (IIRC there have been uncommon examples later than that - which is why I say the cut off time is contentious )

 

Posts

17,939

Likes

37,516

JimInOz

·Jul 16, 2023·Melbourne Australia

Archer

Bergeon will make a tool for just about anything, even turning a simple job into a complex one needing a special tool like this...🙄

So you reckon I don't really need one of these 😉.

 

Posts

29,672

Likes

76,830

Archer

·Jul 16, 2023·Omega Qualified Watchmaker

hoipolloi

You mean you use this?

No, like most watchmakers I use a tool already at my bench...a staking set.

 

Posts

29,672

Likes

76,830

Archer

·Jul 16, 2023·Omega Qualified Watchmaker

JimInOz

So you reckon I don't really need one of these 😉.

 

Posts

738

Likes

1,322

TIMElyBehaviour

·Jul 16, 2023

dsio

The real quickset is Cal 551, laziness maximised

I was thinking more 70’s with the 1011. Bi directional quickset. Epitome of lazy with style.

 

Posts

498

Likes

410

norb1967

·Jul 16, 2023

tamura

Are there 168.005/564 Connys with onyx inlays? That would be important to me.

Absolutely there are.

 

Posts

34,267

Likes

38,886

dsio

·Jul 16, 2023·Ash @ ΩF

TIMElyBehaviour

I was thinking more 70’s with the 1011. Bi directional quickset. Epitome of lazy with style.

I’m a fan of those for sure great and under appreciated watches

 

Posts

1,337

Likes

706

spacemission

·Jul 16, 2023

TIMElyBehaviour

I was thinking more 70’s with the 1011. Bi directional quickset. Epitome of lazy with style.

I like the 1002. It's a real robust calibre.

 

Posts

738

Likes

1,322

TIMElyBehaviour

·Jul 16, 2023

A real pain in the rump quick set is the tissot 2481/omega 1481. It’s the one where you have to depress the crown like a button to get it to change. They get stuck quite frequently.