Joe_A
路I would call this more than a rumor, but not yet established fact . . .
Time will tell.
https://professionalwatches.com/breitling-to-add-a-third-watch-brand/
This was first offered up by Miss Tweed which is a paywalled site where I do not have access:
https://misstweed.com/articles/breitling-to-unveil-gallet-revival-next-month
If this "news" turns out to be true, it'll be good for the all but defunct Gallet brand.
I have some familiarity with Gallet. They have been incorporated in Zurich under at least two names, one of which filed for bankruptcy a while back.
The brand was also incorporated in the US, but here too there were difficulties.
I understand that the IP for the trademark was kept separate from the IP for the manufacturing and distribution as a way of preserving the value of the brand should the design, manufacturing and distribution ever go belly up.
So . . .
If Breitling has obtained a clear title to the brand (or formed some sort of partnership) and intends to position the brand below Breitling itself, this has potential.
Time will tell.
https://professionalwatches.com/breitling-to-add-a-third-watch-brand/
This was first offered up by Miss Tweed which is a paywalled site where I do not have access:
https://misstweed.com/articles/breitling-to-unveil-gallet-revival-next-month
If this "news" turns out to be true, it'll be good for the all but defunct Gallet brand.
I have some familiarity with Gallet. They have been incorporated in Zurich under at least two names, one of which filed for bankruptcy a while back.
The brand was also incorporated in the US, but here too there were difficulties.
I understand that the IP for the trademark was kept separate from the IP for the manufacturing and distribution as a way of preserving the value of the brand should the design, manufacturing and distribution ever go belly up.
So . . .
If Breitling has obtained a clear title to the brand (or formed some sort of partnership) and intends to position the brand below Breitling itself, this has potential.