- Posts
- 178
- Likes
- 220
OmegaBHR
·Whats the thickness of the watch?
Breaking News: The New Steel Speedmaster With Caliber 321 “Ed White”
- Posts
- 43
- Likes
- 84
whiteibex
·O OmegaBHRWhats the thickness of the watch?
It feels slimmer than the regular Moonwatch. I haven't measured but Fratello says 13mm https://www.fratellowatches.com/omega-speedmaster-caliber-321-review-including-a-video/#gref
- Posts
- 134
- Likes
- 455
Ck375
·
- Posts
- 16,743
- Likes
- 47,366
- Posts
- 134
- Likes
- 455
- Posts
- 2,408
- Likes
- 2,537
texasmade
·It looks like quite a few 321’s rolled out the past 2 months.
- Posts
- 384
- Likes
- 645
frazierspa
·Apologies for this being my first posting on the forum but this arrived half an hour ago!
Congratulations, Ck375! Enjoy!
- Posts
- 5,116
- Likes
- 17,784
pdxleaf
·Apologies for this being my first posting on the forum but this arrived half an hour ago!
Thanks for sharing. It is nice to know that there are watches being delivered, even if painfully slowly.
If you don't mind, could you share more details about your ordering process, particularly how long ago and where?
Congrats.
- Posts
- 398
- Likes
- 354
s2000_driver
·O OmegaBHRWhats the thickness of the watch?
13.8mm. It is a tiny bit thinner than the standard moon watch.
- Posts
- 567
- Likes
- 1,810
incabloc
·picked up mine last Saturday...what beauty, I'm excited😁
- Posts
- 795
- Likes
- 1,156
Pazzo
·Please, cover up that open case back, as I can't stand the looks of it. .... 🙄
Congrats and enjoy. ... 😀
Congrats and enjoy. ... 😀
- Posts
- 43
- Likes
- 58
tvlaan
·Was it ever confirmed if the micro-adjust clasp from the 60th bracelet will fit on this one?
- Posts
- 6,959
- Likes
- 13,016
- Posts
- 384
- Likes
- 645
frazierspa
·
Congratulations, incabloc! Very cool!
- Posts
- 134
- Likes
- 455
- Posts
- 121
- Likes
- 183
angschte
·Serial numbers I find an interesting topic on the 321. First of all, is it common to have 'matching numbers' in Omegas, i.e. same serial number on case and movement? Maybe the # is more driven by the movement produced, because comparing the time people receive theirs and the numbers does at least not fully 'line up'?
One Platinum 321 Prototype that I handled in mid 2019 in Biel for example had 88700092, indicating a very early #.
My watch/ movement is 887006xx. But even IF the last three digits are consecutively numbered, it does not mean that all of those movements have made it to watches I would assume.
One Platinum 321 Prototype that I handled in mid 2019 in Biel for example had 88700092, indicating a very early #.
My watch/ movement is 887006xx. But even IF the last three digits are consecutively numbered, it does not mean that all of those movements have made it to watches I would assume.
- Posts
- 733
- Likes
- 1,457
- Posts
- 43
- Likes
- 84
whiteibex
·My watch/ movement is 887006xx. But even IF the last three digits are consecutively numbered, it does not mean that all of those movements have made it to watches I would assume.
I've been researching a bit serial numbers for 321 calibres, and it seems indeed they are all in 887xxxxx format for both the platinum and steel (except for RJ's one which surprisingly is a 888xxxxx ...). All reviews on the platinum show very low serial numbers, in the first 100. Then all recently delivered steel versions are in the 887xx5xx and 887x6xx. I don't know how many platinum were produced but it could be that the first 500 are reserved for platinum. Clearly very low volume for the steel version anyway!
- Posts
- 121
- Likes
- 183
angschte
·I've been researching a bit serial numbers for 321 calibres, and it seems indeed they are all in 887xxxxx format for both the platinum and steel (except for RJ's one which surprisingly is a 888xxxxx ...).
Must be a fake or, more likely, the xx8xxxxx stands for free give-away to influential people 😁 (...sorry RJB I could not resist and I know you bought it...)
Then all recently delivered steel versions are in the 887xx5xx and 887x6xx. I don't know how many platinum were produced but it could be that the first 500 are reserved for platinum. Clearly very low volume for the steel version anyway!
Interestingly that post with Ck375's watch contradicts this theory, as his Steel 321 # is 88700365.
That the Pt versions house lower-numbered 321 movements still makes sense as the production of those must have started earlier.
- Posts
- 46
- Likes
- 80
