BREAKING NEWS - 50th Anniversary Apollo 11 in Steel Revealed

Posts
29,259
Likes
75,673
Are you able to provide some rationale for your rebuttal?

Are you able to provide some rationale for your claims?
 
Posts
259
Likes
364
Are you able to provide some rationale for your claims?

I have done, it is your good self with the single sentence negative contributions.
 
Posts
29,259
Likes
75,673
I have done, it is your good self with the single sentence negative contributions.

I also have done, several times. To me, saying this is the most significant piece since the original is like saying the most significant money made since money was first invented is the latest commemorative coin...

As I posted in another thread...the space program was a great achievement, but the association with the Speedmaster and Omega's milking of it has me rolling my eyes a lot. It was one of thousands of items that were used during the era, and essentially was an off the shelf item. I have more interest in things that were a challenge in getting people off the earth such as developing a fuel pump that would pump enough to feed the engines - that's a real engineering achievement that I can respect as an engineer.
 
Posts
1,090
Likes
634
I don't agree. It's not the most significant piece since the original. That's it.

tumblr_nmg8ayQs1v1skelofo1_500.jpg
 
Posts
259
Likes
364
I also have done, several times. To me, saying this is the most significant piece since the original is like saying the most significant money made since money was first invented is the latest commemorative coin...

As I posted in another thread...the space program was a great achievement, but the association with the Speedmaster and Omega's milking of it has me rolling my eyes a lot. It was one of thousands of items that were used during the era, and essentially was an off the shelf item. I have more interest in things that were a challenge in getting people off the earth such as developing a fuel pump that would pump enough to feed the engines - that's a real engineering achievement that I can respect as an engineer.

Ok thanks for elaborating, would be a boring forum if we all had the same views and opinions.

I have to agree the association has been milked to death but in this instance I feel the significant anniversary is something to be celebrated, I like what they have done with this piece, Buzz's posterior excepted, and I am looking forward to collection day.
 
Posts
29,259
Likes
75,673
Ok thanks for elaborating, would be a boring forum if we all had the same views and opinions.

I have to agree the association has been milked to death but in this instance I feel the significant anniversary is something to be celebrated, I like what they have done with this piece, Buzz's posterior excepted, and I am looking forward to collection day.

If people love this watch to death, don't love it but still want it because of the space connection, and they are very excited about it, that's all good with me. The expectation that everyone else should feel the same, and remarks about serious collectors "must" do this or that are the things that I can't stand. I've never been one to buy into the "every collector must have X watch" kind of herd thinking.

The only reason I buy any watch is because I like it. Not because it's commemorates something (no matter how direct or tenuous the connection), not because other collectors think I should own it, not because it will have good resale value, etc. None of that means anything to me unless I like the watch, and in this case I most definitely do not like the watch.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
437
Likes
673
I also have done, several times. To me, saying this is the most significant piece since the original is like saying the most significant money made since money was first invented is the latest commemorative coin...

As I posted in another thread...the space program was a great achievement, but the association with the Speedmaster and Omega's milking of it has me rolling my eyes a lot. It was one of thousands of items that were used during the era, and essentially was an off the shelf item. I have more interest in things that were a challenge in getting people off the earth such as developing a fuel pump that would pump enough to feed the engines - that's a real engineering achievement that I can respect as an engineer.

TBH, I can't see many folk being interested in collecting fuel pumps or anniversary fuel pumps however important they might have been in the Apollo space programme. Each to their own of course. As an engineer, I can see how fuel pumps would be fascinating but surely a time-piece has a broader resonance with the general public and that's why we have seen a groundswell of interest in this model (and many that have preceded it). Even my kids have shown an interest in this watch because of the association with the moon landing (having shown next to no interest in any others I've collected over the years).
 
Posts
29,259
Likes
75,673
TBH, I can't see many folk being interested in collecting fuel pumps or anniversary fuel pumps however important they might have been in the Apollo space programme. Each to their own of course. As an engineer, I can see how fuel pumps would be fascinating but surely a time-piece has a broader resonance with the general public and that's why we have seen a groundswell of interest in this model (and many that have preceded it). Even my kids have shown an interest in this watch because of the association with the moon landing (having shown next to no interest in any others I've collected over the years).

You will note of course that I said nothing about collecting fuel pumps...and that was clearly not my point. 🙄

The fuel pump is infinitely more important to the success of the space program than a wrist watch was, no matter what Omega fans want to believe. People act as if this watch single handedly landed people on the moon without the hundreds of thousands of people (engineers, scientists and other workers) from all over the world that made this actually happen...

You are correct that it is much more relatable than a fuel pump is, but then again it's just a watch (heresy I know). Let's not make a commemorative watch something that it isn't. As I've said before, I don't collect plates from Royal weddings, so collecting commemorative watches just isn't my thing. If it's yours, that's great, but don't expect everyone to share the excitement about such a watch.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
25
Likes
48
You will note of course that I said nothing about collecting fuel pumps...and that was clearly not my point. 🙄

The fuel pump is infinitely more important to the success of the space program than a wrist watch was, no matter what Omega fans want to believe. People act as if this watch single handedly landed people on the moon without the hundreds of thousands of people (engineers, scientists and other workers) from all over the world that made this actually happen...

You are correct that it is much more relatable than a fuel pump is, but then again it's just a watch (heresy I know). Let's not make a commemorative watch something that it isn't. As I've said before, I don't collect plates from Royal weddings, so collecting commemorative watches just isn't my thing. If it's yours, that's great, but don't expect everyone to share the excitement about such a watch.

Cheers, Al

You must be a real blast a party...(no pun intended)
 
Posts
29,259
Likes
75,673
You must be a real blast a party...(no pun intended)

Thanks - I am.
 
Posts
252
Likes
266
So you think a Speedmaster collector will ignore the model which pays tribute to the biggest single space exploration event of the 20th century because he has an issue with some aspect of the execution.

Interesting point of view.
I am a massive Speedy fan and I have some issues with the execution although I do appreciate some of the improvements I have decided to give it a miss. I hope that's ok. Most following this thread have deposits down and love it .The others who are not in love will mostly say nothing and not follow. So you will mostly read about positive views and the waiting list etc on this thread.
 
Posts
99
Likes
626
I am looking forward to collection day.
And my wife is, after all I left home to the sound of "And don't spend any money." ringing in my ears. Then you persuaded me otherwise.
 
Posts
208
Likes
983

$9000 on the bay

I think my wife will put her foot down on collecting fuel pumps. What is the resale value of these things?
 
Posts
437
Likes
673

$9000 on the bay

I think my wife will put her foot down on collecting fuel pumps. What is the resale value of these things?

I've no idea, but that looks like a particularly fine example that will definitely appreciate over time. It also an obvious gold trimming too which go down well with collectors.
 
Posts
29,259
Likes
75,673
I've no idea, but that looks like a particularly fine example that will definitely appreciate over time. It also an obvious gold trimming too which go down well with collectors.

Everyone knows TT fuel pumps went out of style in the 90's mate. 🤮

😉
 
Posts
437
Likes
673
Everyone knows TT fuel pumps went out of style in the 90's mate. 🤮

😉

Apparently a revival is in progress ...
 
Posts
259
Likes
364

$9000 on the bay

I think my wife will put her foot down on collecting fuel pumps. What is the resale value of these things?

That is a nice piece but I think I will wait for the Moonshine Gold version!
 
Posts
886
Likes
471
TBH, I can't see many folk being interested in collecting fuel pumps or anniversary fuel pumps however important they might have been in the Apollo space programme. Each to their own of course. As an engineer, I can see how fuel pumps would be fascinating but surely a time-piece has a broader resonance with the general public and that's why we have seen a groundswell of interest in this model (and many that have preceded it). Even my kids have shown an interest in this watch because of the association with the moon landing (having shown next to no interest in any others I've collected over the years).

I'm not into fuel pumps.
But I like old Outboard motors.
 
Posts
886
Likes
471
TBH, I can't see many folk being interested in collecting fuel pumps or anniversary fuel pumps however important they might have been in the Apollo space programme. Each to their own of course. As an engineer, I can see how fuel pumps would be fascinating but surely a time-piece has a broader resonance with the general public and that's why we have seen a groundswell of interest in this model (and many that have preceded it). Even my kids have shown an interest in this watch because of the association with the moon landing (having shown next to no interest in any others I've collected over the years).

Interesting your kids are interested all these years later.
I'm interested.
Then again, our generation was given time off school to watch it live on TV. I thought it was a little boring at the time and the images on TV weren't that good anyway. But I did mostly get the significance of it all.
Once they started driving around in a Moon buggy then the light really went on in my head.
Anything with wheels is good.