Canuck
·@Foo2rama suggests in his latest post that the word Observatory on the dial of the subject watch, that “having Observatory on the dial of a non-chronometer watch meant nothing”! Yet I showed a picture of the same basic caliber 600 movement (the Royalite) that has Observatory on the dial, and a movement that is timed to 5 positions, heat, and cold. One watch with Observatory on the dial with a movement that is clearly not a chronometer, and another one with Observatory on the dial, the same basic caliber, that clearly IS a chronometer movement! How these things happen on watches that are 90 years old, produced at a time when (it appears) Rolex had an “anything goes” attitude, is not possible. My contention is that the subject Birks Rolex just MAY have been produced as you see it. Why anybody would feel creating a “fake” with BIRKS on the dial, rather than ROLEX would be an easier sell, is unclear to me.

