Big watch, Small wrist

Posts
335
Likes
1,011
oh no it looks much better now 馃榾
Yes sometimes is better to see the bigger picture
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
It might be the perspective and position as some have said, Let鈥檚 see some more wrist shots!
Probably the angle and how close the previous photo was the problem
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
In my opinion: way too large on your wrist, looks disproportionate, so not nice.


You are right, but you think that although the watch is very beautiful it is not worth using?
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
If I am correct that is the reference 2806. According to the Omega website the case diameter is 49.2 mm. Here鈥檚 the thing, that size would wear very large on almost everyone. Additionally, the watch has almost no bezel and a very large dial. This makes it wear even larger. If you are a large watch guy then go for it. However, the fact that you are questioning the choice means that you don鈥檛 want a watch that wears too big. The answer to your question is yes, it is a big watch and it definitely wears big. You would have to have an 8 inch plus size wrist to carry this one off without it looking big. At the end of the day it鈥檚 your watch and your wrist so wear what you like. If it were me I would go for the 39 mm version.

I really didn't know there was a diameter of 39 mm. I will do my best to get that watch and show you the before and after so you can tell the difference
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
Amen! This should be copy/pasted into every "what do you think", "help me decide" etc. thread
I really want to know, cause some times, I can not tell if its look good at distance
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
No, that would be zero help. What you鈥檙e failing to recognize is that the people that post those threads truly want the opinions of people on this forum who are allegedly knowledgeable about watches. It鈥檚 not like they posted the thread to show off their new watch and members started peppering them with comments about it being too big, too small, etc. They are the ones who are looking for an opinion, validation, or whatever. It鈥檚 only fair to provide one. We鈥檝e all been there!
Thanks man, It really helps to receive opinions from people that knows better
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
Yes, I still think it鈥檚 way too big for your wrist, and it probably would be for most guys. Just my opinion - please don鈥檛 bust my chops. Happy Holidays!
Thanks for that. I really appreciate your opinion. It helps a lot
 
Posts
29,221
Likes
75,512
I really didn't know there was a diameter of 39 mm. I will do my best to get that watch and show you the before and after so you can tell the difference

The 49.2 mm is the largest, but there's also a 42.2 mm, and on a strap that would be ref. 28025237.

The 39.2 mm version on a strap would be ref. 28035231, and finally the 36.2 mm version on a bracelet is ref. 25045200.

Lots to choose from for sizes in this model...but note they have very different movements in some.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
I owned this exact model for very short period of time. I have 7.5 in wrists and loved the look of it, just not on my wrist. It was obnoxiously huge. Also, one of the first times I wore it, some non watch stranger made a smart ass comment about it's size and that was it. I traded it shortly after that. Like some have said, it is a personal preference, and my personal preference shrunk significantly after owning it. I own a PO chronograph and that is as large as I go. One of the things that makes it look so large, is the dial is not much smaller than the case. If I would have bought the 39.5mm instead, I probably would still have it.

I agree with you man. Probably if happen something like that I would not have this doubt
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
@Archer ...Al, you are absolutely right. This is a collector community and our tastes run to the classical. It does occur to me that @watchdaddy1 and some of our Paneristi could provide some insight on how to sport a large watch. One thought @leandroquezada, head over to aaronbespoke.com and have a look at his straps. He鈥檚 good matching straps to watches. Changing that black strap to something bolder might make it work.
Thanks man for that. I was checking the bands and probably something different make the watch looks more suitable
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
it does look a lil large. but the pic u provided is still somewhat of a close up shot and not a distance shot. just because the lugs appear to over hang doesn't mean that they are in real life.
Yes probably was the picture but I think as the community said. still look kind of bigger for my wrist
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
Since you ask for an opinion, I can give you mine. I think it looks big on your wrist in that picture. However, my opinion comes from my own personal preferences. I prefer small watches.
This was the only big watch that I had so it was important know the opinion for the community that know better. Thanks for your opinion
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
In my opinion: way too large on your wrist, looks disproportionate, so not nice.
Thanks for the opinion. The community really helps me in this. Sometimes the watch need to fits you to really looks how it suppose to look
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
but note they have very different movements in some.

thank you very much i didn't know that. I will check it
 
Posts
1,232
Likes
5,682
You are right, but you think that although the watch is very beautiful it is not worth using?

Only you can answer that question.

I
would not use it because I don't find it nice to look at or comfortable to wear, so no no, and the world is awash with watches (specially vintage) I find both nice to look at on my wrist and comfortable to wear. My wrist is also small BTW.
 
Posts
7,635
Likes
21,906
I think you should buy it if you like it and it makes you feel great.
But if you鈥檙e going to keep asking yourself questions about it then maybe it鈥檚 too many questions for a watch that鈥檚 going to cost you several thousand dollars/ or euros/ or swiss francs or whatever currency you choose.

Considering how many sizes @Archer says exist of this model, just try all the sizes, buy one if you love it - and if you鈥檙e not sure just keep your money. I鈥檓 sure you鈥檒l find other ways to use it.

Best regards,
S
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,981
This thread has gone on for 6 pages (much of it tangential arguments of the existential first world crisis of watch size), but if you are still asking yourself if you like it or not- it鈥檚 a no.
 
Posts
12,107
Likes
40,239
Considering how many sizes @Archer says exist of this model, just try all the sizes,

Generally this is the way to go for a new watch, but these have been out of production for years and trying them on would probably involve having to buy (and return) them, or wait a very long time for local dealers to potentially get them in stock... I鈥檇 say look for the size option closest to one that you know works for you.
 
Posts
102
Likes
37
OP, the lugs are still within your wrist, so the watch might be very big on you, but things could be even worse 馃榿

I'd be more concerned with how you wear your watch though. Why wear it besides the forearm's bone and the wrist ? Besides being unsightly, isn't that uncomfortable ??

My personal view is if there should be at least some strap curve top and bottom of the watch, if the strap is pulled vertically down from the lugs then it's too large. Worse still is if the lugs are protruding over the edges of the wrist.
Agreed. Lug distance is usually correlated to the case diameter, so can the latter metric can serve as a rule of thumb - but there are exceptions/oddities, so it's worth paying attention to both measurements.
Edited:
 
Posts
335
Likes
1,011
Only you can answer that question.

I
would not use it because I don't find it nice to look at or comfortable to wear, so no no, and the world is awash with watches (specially vintage) I find both nice to look at on my wrist and comfortable to wear. My wrist is also small BTW.
Thanks for participate in the discussion I will take your advise in consideration