Bad/Franken-Tri?

Posts
3,255
Likes
14,141
Am I mistaken?
A good exercise to train your eye is to list the things you think are wrong below. Then everyone can chime in, and you'll find you have missed a lot. (OK, maybe that's just me 🤦) A redial? Obviously. But what are the specific clues that give it away? Wrong hands? What should they be instead?
 
Posts
3,119
Likes
23,913
A good exercise to train your eye is to list the things you think are wrong below.

With this example though, it might be easier / faster to list down what could be correct? ::facepalm1::
 
Posts
1,071
Likes
2,167
A good exercise to train your eye is to list the things you think are wrong below.
I take it no one is too concerned about essentially "teaching" the less scrupulous how to produce better fakes? If that's the case, I'll post my thoughts on some of the Antiquorum lots coming up.
 
Posts
13,698
Likes
53,498
j
I take it no one is too concerned about essentially "teaching" the less scrupulous how to produce better fakes? If that's the case, I'll post my thoughts on some of the Antiquorum lots coming up.
What would be the point or fun of OF forums if we all decided to clam up evaluating watches for Frankenstein/Fake/Redial issues? Better to offer a resource that allow folks in this thing of ours to make informed decisions. With regard to this watch.. a 3 second glance immediately flags the bad redial and H/M hands, missing chrono hand (did these idiots post a pic with chrono function engaged? Possibly). Sad that it has a desirable moon disc. Once you learn to spot immediate undisclosed/dealbreaker flaws, no point in looking further.
Edited: