Forums Latest Members
  1. Canuck Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    13,468
    Likes
    37,960
    I have just completed servicing my Hamilton Model XXI marine chronometer, after having not run it for, well, decades. I just finished it today, and haven’t fussed with regulating it. But it has dropped about 5 seconds in 48 hours. At its best, years ago, it was consistently within 5 seconds per month. Having not run for a very long time, I will let it settle in for about a month before I get serious. This one was completed on September 7, 1944. I bought it in Coupeville, Washington, in 1985. This is the third time I have serviced it.

    DDE82A27-A31D-4293-84CA-5ED943E4FC4E.jpeg 8C4BFE2F-6CAC-4E6C-9FD1-69A9FB908707.jpeg 06442C32-CF08-435E-B346-AF0A3B492F98.jpeg
     
  2. janice&fred Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    4,593
    Likes
    10,441
    That ship's clock service must have been a walk in the park compared to climbing around in that tower clock a few weeks ago :D
     
    kkt, KingCrouchy, pdxleaf and 3 others like this.
  3. JwRosenthal Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    14,916
    Likes
    40,247
    Lol- no cardio or weight belts required!
     
  4. Canuck Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    13,468
    Likes
    37,960
    These are a pleasure to work on. Parts the size of a clock, with fit and finish of a high quality watch. Earnshaw, dead beat escapement, key wound, key set, fusee, 52-hours on a winding, up/down indicator, 14,400 bph, helical hairspring, temperature compensated balance wheel, movement suspended in a gimbal, Honduras mahogany case built by the Heintzman Piano Co., New York. One of about 13,500 made between 1943 and circa 1965.

    F70BFA73-749B-4A0F-BA49-46620E01FAF2.jpeg
     
    Waltesefalcon, Alpha, 140dave and 5 others like this.
  5. wagudc Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    4,388
    Likes
    11,063
  6. Canuck Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    13,468
    Likes
    37,960
    Thanks @wagudc. I’d forgotten I had told that story. I recently corresponded with @Deafboy who has acquired a model XXI. He did a spectacular job on his, so I was inspired to return mine to service. Mine would have run any time I might have wound it over the years since I serviced it last. But I refrain from running it unless it has just been serviced.
     
    Deafboy and wagudc like this.
  7. Dan S Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    18,777
    Likes
    43,198
    Now I want one. ::facepalm2::
     
    JwRosenthal, DaveK, Deafboy and 2 others like this.
  8. Canuck Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    13,468
    Likes
    37,960
    They are around. Many found today have after market boxes on them, a lot of them with NOS hardware. Mine is all original. If you find a chronometer in its tub, I have a suspicion that Larry Crutsinger has boxes and hardware.
     
    Dan S likes this.
  9. connieseamaster Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    1,375
    Likes
    1,978
    16064351017177576773202925427949.jpg

    Model XXI that is in my temporary custody as my parents are moving and don't trust the moving company *that* much :D
     
    Waltesefalcon, Alpha, Deafboy and 4 others like this.
  10. Canuck Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    13,468
    Likes
    37,960
    WOW! Serial number 4! That is an early one. What a treasure!
     
  11. mzinski Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    485
    Likes
    1,671
    Awesome! Well done, I love seeing things like this repaired. I’ve been eyeing Model 22’s, but the deck hand version (is that what they’re called when not in box?). I’ll pull the trigger eventually.
     
  12. Canuck Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    13,468
    Likes
    37,960
    ,
    You might be referring to a comparing watch. These are basically a pocket watch movement in a pocket watch case (see link). On board a ship that carried more than one marine chronometer, the chronometers were never to be in the same location (spelled kamikaze). So a comparing watch was used to check the time on several chronometers. The model 22 was also produced without the gimbals and the wooden case. These are called a chronometer watch. Some model 22s came in a wooden case without the chronometer tub and gimbals.

    http://www.hamiltonchronicles.com/2013/07/1941-us-navy-wwii-comparing-watch-model.html
     
  13. wagudc Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    4,388
    Likes
    11,063
    There are a handful of members on this forum that I learn something from virtually every post. You are one of them. Thanks for sharing the knowledge!
     
    ConElPueblo and DaveK like this.
  14. Canuck Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    13,468
    Likes
    37,960
    Hamilton delivered the first 2 chronometers in February of 1942. They delivered 5 in May of 1942. The serial number 4 (above) might have been one of the first seven chronometers delivered by Hamilton.
     
    connieseamaster, DaveK and Dan S like this.
  15. mzinski Nov 26, 2020

    Posts
    485
    Likes
    1,671
    Thanks, good info. I was thinking the non-gimbaled version of the Model 22: http://www.hamiltonchronicles.com/2014/05/1941-model-22-marine-chronometer.html?m=1
     
  16. connieseamaster Nov 27, 2020

    Posts
    1,375
    Likes
    1,978
    It is. My dad collected chronometers for a while in the 80s and 90s but eventually got bored with them so he sold a bunch when my parents were looking to finance an addition to their house. This XXI, a XXII, and a Seiko chronometer from the same era are the ones that 9 year old me insisted he keep.
     
    Deafboy, DaveK and janice&fred like this.
  17. Canuck Nov 27, 2020

    Posts
    13,468
    Likes
    37,960
    Thanks for posting model XXI, s# 4. I have saved the image to my photo files because I very much doubt I’ll ever see an earlier one. Momentous!
     
    connieseamaster and wagudc like this.
  18. Canuck Dec 14, 2020

    Posts
    13,468
    Likes
    37,960
    I posted this thread on Nov. 26 at which time I reported that the Hamilton model XXI marine chronometer was losing close to 5 seconds per day, post servicing. As of today, it has been running for close to three weeks. I have been allowing it to settle in, following several decades of dormancy. In the last two weeks, it has settled into a daily loss of close to three seconds. So today, I will move the regulating screws, re-set it, and continue monitoring it.

    My Hamilton model XXII marine chronometer I serviced on Dec. 4, and set it running, also after a long period of dormancy. As of today, it is 21 seconds slow after a 10 day run. So today it will be regulated and re-set as well.

    CE33C24F-8D4C-4666-B2D4-74FABBCA2763.jpeg